期刊文献+

美国反托拉斯法中的经济学理论发展及启示 被引量:2

Development of Economic Theories in the US Anti-Trust Law and Its Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国是目前世界上反垄断法比较完善、反垄断经济学最为发达的国家,其反托拉斯法与经济理论的发展历程可以划分为五个阶段:早期自由竞争理论与反托拉斯法律体系的形成、凯恩斯主义与本身违法原则、哈佛学派与结构主义、芝加哥学派与行为主义、新产业组织理论与反垄断综合执法。美国反托拉斯法治实践表明,反垄断立法、执法、司法与经济理论、经济研究范式具有正相关性。美国反托拉斯法治实践中的经济理论运用情况,对于还处于起步阶段的中国反垄断法治实践,具有重要的启示和借鉴意义。 The United States is widely recognized as a country where the anti-monopoly law is relatively well-developed and the study of anti-monopoly economics is leading the world.The history of its development of the anti-Trust law and its related economic theory has undergone five stages:the formulation of the early theory of free competition and the anti-Trust legal system,Keynesianism and per se rule,the Harvard School and structuralism,the Chicago School and behaviorism,new industrial organization theory and the comprehensive enforcement of the anti-Trust law.US anti-Trust legal practice shows that the enactment,enforcement and practice of the anti-Trust law have a positive correlation with economic theoretical and economic research paradigmatic explorations.It is suggested that the application of economic theories in US anti-Trust legal practice has important implications for the newly emergent practice of anti-monopoly law in China.
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期51-58,共8页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
关键词 美国 反托拉斯法 经济理论 市场经济 US anti-Trust law economic theory market economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Northern Securities Co. v. United States ,193 U. S. 197, (1904).
  • 2Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States,221 U. S. 1, ( 1911 ).
  • 3欧内斯特·盖尔霍恩,威廉姆·科瓦契奇,斯蒂芬·卡尔金斯.《反垄断法与经济学》,任勇、邓志松、尹建平译,北京:法律出版社,2009年,第24-25、前言、334页.
  • 4United States v. Trans - Missouri Fright Association, 166 U. S. 290 ( 1897 ).
  • 5United States v. Joint Traffic Association, 171 U. S. 505 ( 1898 ).
  • 6United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. ,273 U. S. 392( 1927 ).
  • 7United States v. Socony- Vacuum Oli Co. ,310 U. S. 150(1940).
  • 8丁茂中.《美国现代反托拉斯法发展简史(电子专著)》,http://dingmaozhong.bokee.com/index.html.
  • 9United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F. 2d 416,427 (2d Cir. 1945 ).
  • 10United States v. AT&T Co.552 F. Supp. 131 (D. D. C. 1982).

共引文献2

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部