摘要
《大学》、《中庸》自宋列入四书以来,从未间断过对它们的理解与争论。郭店楚简出土之前,学者们通常把宋代"心性"之学的架构追溯到孟子。从学理逻辑的内部发展来说,宋儒赋予早期儒家"孔子—曾子—子思—孟子"的学术谱系基本是可信的;但是惜其为时空所限,如陆九渊之大儒也对子思诸儒语焉不详。随着郭店简、上博简文作为"孔—孟"之间产物的看法得到了学界愈多的共识,两类文本所揭示的思想性格也为我们更好地解决学、庸诸谜提供了一扇崭新的视窗,开辟出考证《大学》与《中庸》的血脉关联(包括历史时序问题)的新途径。学、庸引诗与用诗的材料也极具文化意义。
The author focuses on the comprehensive realization of Nature study in the Great Learning and the Doctrine of the Mean. By way of confirming one another among quotative poems and materials of the above, this part has confirmed the consistency of their inher- ent spirit, and more forcefully highlights the holistic cultural sentiment and spiritual visage of the viewpoint of Zisi - Mencius' Confucian. They also have strong cultural significance.
出处
《商丘师范学院学报》
CAS
2010年第5期30-35,共6页
Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
关键词
学庸
心性论
文化史意义
the Great Learning and the Doctrine of the Mean
contemplations on human nature
cultural significance