期刊文献+

中山市城市森林足迹计算与分析 被引量:1

Calculation and Analysis of Urban Forest Footprint of Zhongshan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章应用生态足迹评价模型,通过衡量城市居民在生产和生活中产生的CO2总量和城市森林能够吸收CO2总量之间的平衡关系,对中山市生态环境发展的可持续性进行分析。结果表明,2003~2005年,由于液化石油气的大幅度消费增长,中山市城市森林生态足迹大幅增长。但城市森林承载力稳步增长。2005年中山市城市森林足迹46 058.93 hm2,生态赤字22 091.41 hm2,生态压力指数1.92,处于生态不可持续状态。应尽快通过发展绿色能源、提高能源利用效率、扩大城市森林面积和提高单位面积森林生产力等途径,减少城市森林足迹,提高城市的可持续发展能力。 According to the calculation method of ecological footprint,the ecological sustainability of Zhongshan was analyzed by measuring the balance between discharge volume of CO2 through industrial,domestic consumption and reducing discharge volume of CO2 by urban forest.The result showed that the urban forest footprint was 46 058.93 hm2,the urban forest ecological deficit was 22 091.41 hm2 and the UFI was 1.92 in 2005.The ecological system of Zhongshan is unsustainable.As a conclusion,the paper pointed out the UFF should be decreased and the sustainable development capability should be improved,as soon as possible,by developing green energies,improving energy efficiency,expanding urban forest area and by increasing the productive force of forest.
出处 《广东林业科技》 2010年第2期64-68,共5页 Forestry Science and Technology of Guangdong Province
基金 2009年中山市财政资助的中山市林业科研与推广自立项目:中山市城市林业建设与评价体系研究与实践
关键词 城市森林 生态足迹 能源消费 urban forest ecological footprint energy consumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献40

  • 1熊德国,鲜学福,姜永东.生态足迹理论在区域可持续发展评价中的应用及改进[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(6):618-626. 被引量:190
  • 2何英.森林固碳估算方法综述[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(1):22-27. 被引量:104
  • 3徐中民,生态经济工作论文(2001—01),2001年
  • 4Lieth H,Primary Productivity of the Biosphere,1975年
  • 5Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics,1997, 20:3-24.
  • 6Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38:25-45.
  • 7Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K H, Haberl H, Schulz N B. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an `actual land area' approach. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21:261-269.
  • 8Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N B, Erb K H, Haberl H, Krausmann F. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21: 271-278.
  • 9陕西省统计局.陕西统计年鉴1978-2003[M].北京: 中国统计出版社,1978-2003..
  • 10上海市统计局.上海统计年鉴(1999-2003)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004..

共引文献964

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部