期刊文献+

从“希望六”计划解读美国公共住房政策 被引量:4

An Interpretation of the U.S. Public Housing Policy from HOPE Ⅵ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1992年出台的美国公共住房政策"希望六"计划又称作"都市再生示范计划"。在2000年10月,"希望六"计划荣获美国政府创新奖,得到国家的充分肯定。截至2008年,这个计划共计投资170亿美元,一些项目不但帮助改善了周围邻里的生活条件,同时也促进了整个中心城市的社区振兴。"希望六"计划已经成为项目融资、管理和提供服务等方面革新的孵化器。 The HOPE Ⅵ program,also called the Urban Revitalization Demonstration program,was created in 1992.In October of 2000,HOPE Ⅵ was honored with national recognition as a recipient of innovations in American Government Award.Up to 2008,HOPE Ⅵ has awarded over $17 billion.Some projects have helped turn around conditions in the surrounding neighborhoods and have contributed to the revitalization of whole inner-city communities.HOPE Ⅵ has been an incubator for innovations in project financing,management and service delivery.
作者 吴伟 林磊
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期70-75,共6页 Urban Planning International
关键词 “希望六”计划 公共住房 美国公共住房政策 HOPE Ⅵ Public Housing U.S.Public Housing Policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Martin D. Abravanel, Diane K. Levy, Margaret McFarland. The Uncharted, Uncertain Future Of HOPE VI Redevelopments-The Case for Assessing Project Sustainability[R], NW Washington, DC, U.S.: The Urban Institute, MD U.S.: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, 2009.
  • 2Susan J. Popkin. Testimony prepared for the hearing on Academic Perspectives on the Future of Public Housing [R]. NW Washington DC, U.S.: The Urban Institute, 2009.
  • 3Robin E. Smith, Kadija Ferryman. Saying Good-Bye: Relocating Senior Citizens in the HOPE VI Panel Study[R]. NW Washington DC, U,S,: The Urban Institute, 2006.
  • 4Susan J. Popkin, Bruce Katz, Mary K. Cunningham, Karen D. Brown Jeremy Gustafson and Margery A. Turner. A DECADE OF HOPE VI Research Findings and Policy Challenges [R]. NW Washington DC, U.S. The Urban Institute, 2004.
  • 5HOPE VI[EB/OL]. 2009-05-10. http://www.hud.gov/.
  • 6HOPE VI Program[EB/OL]. 2009-08-08. http://www.seattlehousing.org/ redevelopment/hope-vi/.
  • 7False HOPE- A Critical Assessment of the HOPE VI Public Housing Redevelopment Program[EB/OL]. 2002- 06. http://www.nhlp.org/html/ pubhsg/FalseHOPE.pdf.
  • 8David Waiters. Designing Community[M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd, 2007.
  • 9孙斌栋,刘学良.美国混合居住政策及其效应的研究述评--兼论对我国经济适用房和廉租房规划建设的启示[J].城市规划学刊,2009(1):90-97. 被引量:37
  • 10中央财政将投资9000亿元加强保障性住房建设[EB/OL]2008-11-12.http://www.cin.gov.cn/.

二级参考文献44

  • 1SAP.JISSIAN W. The idea of social mix in town planning: an historical review [J], Urban Studies, 1976, 13(3):231-246.
  • 2LUSIGNAN P R. Public housing in the United States, 1933- 1949 [J]. Cultural Resource Management,2002,25(1):36-37.
  • 3SCHILL M H. Distressed public housing: where do we go from here [J]? The University of Chicago Law Review, 1993, 60(2): 497-554.
  • 4VALE L J. The future of planned poverty: redeveloping America's most distressed public housing projects [J]. Neth. J. of housing and the Building Environment, 1999, 14(1):13-31.
  • 5ATKINSON R. Neighbourhoods and the impacts of social mix: crime, tenure diversification and assisted mobility [OL], 2005. http: / /www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/cnrpaperspdf/cnr29pap.pdf
  • 6WILSON WJ.真正的穷人[M].成伯清,鲍磊,张戌凡,译.上海人民出版社.2007
  • 7WILSON W J. Another look at the truly disadvantaged[J].Political Science Quarterly, 1991, 106(4):639- 656.
  • 8FEITOSA F F, WISSMANN A. Social-mix policy approaches to urban segregation in Europe and the United States [M]. Zentrum for Entwicklungschung Center for Development Research Universitat Bonn, 2006.
  • 9RANKIN B H., QUANE J M. Neighborhood poverty, and the social isolation of inner-city African American families [J]. Social Forces, 2000, 79(1):139-164.
  • 10CRANE J. The epidemic theory, of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1991, 96(5):1226-1259.

共引文献38

同被引文献89

  • 1张更立.走向三方合作的伙伴关系:西方城市更新政策的演变及其对中国的启示[J].城市发展研究,2004,11(4):26-32. 被引量:128
  • 2王丹,王士君.美国“新城市主义”与“精明增长”发展观解读[J].国际城市规划,2007,22(2):61-66. 被引量:63
  • 3李莉,王旭.美国公共住房政策的演变与启示[J].东南学术,2007(5):48-53. 被引量:20
  • 4Chen J, Stepbens M, Man Yanyun. The Future of Public Housing: Ongoing Trends in the East and the West [ M ]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013 : 181 - 193.
  • 5Fraser J C, Burns A B, Bazuin J T, et al. HOPE VI, colonization, and the production of difference [ J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2013,49(4) : 525 -556.
  • 6Deng L. The cost-effectiveness of the low-income housing tax credit relative to vouchers: evidence from six metropolitan areas [ J ]. Housing Policy Debate, 2005, 16(3/4): 469-511.
  • 7Popkin S J, Katz B, Cunningham M K, et al. A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges [ R ] Washington. DC: Urban Institute& The Brookings Institution, 2004.
  • 8Sink T, Ceh B. Relocation of urban poor in Chicago: HOPE VI policy outcomes[J]. Geoforum, 2011, (42) : 71 -82.
  • 9Schwartz A E, McCabe B J, Ellen I G, et al. Public schools, public housing: The education of children living in public housing [ J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2010, 46 ( 1 ) : 68 - 89.
  • 10McClure K. The low-income housing tax credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 2006, 17(3) : 419 -446.

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部