期刊文献+

替罗非班在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的应用 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在传统抗血小板和抗凝治疗基础上,加用血小板糖蛋白GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂替罗非班,能否改善患者冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后的心肌标志物升高与不良预后明显相关性。方法通过冠状动脉造影(CAG)确诊为冠心病的患者56例,30例患者接受传统抗血小板和抗凝治疗作为对照组,26例患者在PCI术后在对照组治疗的基础上加用替罗非班作为治疗组,治疗组患者在接受PCI术后开始替罗非班静脉负荷量,至术后第3~5天,对照组患者接受PCI术后立即应用低分子肝素,观察术后心肌标志物[CK-MB(肌酸激酶同工酶)、TnI(肌钙蛋白I)]水平。结果应用替罗非班联合低分子肝素治疗与单纯低分子肝素治疗相比,可以明显降低患者PCI后12 h和24 h的CK-MB水平以及术后6 h的TnI水平。结论在传统抗血小板和抗凝治疗基础上,加用血小板糖蛋白PⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂替罗非班,替罗非班可以减少患者选择性PCI术后的CK-MB和Tnl的释放,降低48h的联合心脏事件,并发症没有增加。
出处 《慢性病学杂志》 2010年第6期496-497,共2页 Chronic Pathematology Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王同汉,刘映峰,李志梁,魏向龙,石向东.急性心肌梗死伴心衰、心源性休克病人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗近中期疗效[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(8):1064-1066. 被引量:8
  • 2Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M,et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries(C-SIRIUS)[J]. J Am Coll Cardio,2004,43(6) :1,110.
  • 3韩雅玲,荆全民,王守力,王冬梅,苗志林,王祖禄,刘海伟,张晓星.直接冠状动脉支架置入术的前瞻性临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(5):265-268. 被引量:37
  • 4王吉耀.内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.245.
  • 5Tollesion TR, Newby LK, Haningtion RA, et al. Freguency of stent thrombosis after acute coronary syndromes(from the SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY trials)[J].Am J Cardiol, 2003, 92(3) :330.
  • 6胡大一,马长生.心脏病学实践[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:291-297.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review [J]. JAMA, 1997, 278(23): 2093-8.
  • 2毛焕元 曹林生.心脏病学[M]:第2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1116-7.
  • 3Zijlstra F, Hoomtje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction [J]. NEnglJMed, 1999, 341 (19):1413-9.
  • 4Le May MR, Labinaz M, Davies RF, et al. Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 37(4): 985-91.
  • 5Kaul U, Singh B, Sudan D, et al. Outcome of primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Indian Heart J,1998, 50(4): 402-8.
  • 6Morishima I, Sone T, Okumura K, et al. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, 36(4):1202-9.
  • 7Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, et al. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory:The PRAGUE study [J]. Eur Heart J,2000, 21(10): 823-31.
  • 8Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial-PRAGUE-2 [J]. Eur Heart J, 2003, 24( 1): 94-104.
  • 9Kaul U, Sapra R, Singh B, et al. Reversal of slow flow phenomenon during primary stenting by bail-out administration of abciximab [J].Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, 2000, 3(1): 35-9.
  • 10Piana RN, Paik GY, Moscucci M, et al. Incidence and treatment of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Circulation,1994,89(6): 2514-8.

共引文献116

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部