摘要
空白罪状由于概括性的委任立法使得规范弹性具有难以避免性和合理性,法律概念的相对性更为明显,部门法规范的易变性也使得其容易出现偏离立法规范目标的情况,对其必须进行刑法的独立规范判断,区分事实问题和法律问题。提倡双向对应的规范解释路径,能够有效地实现概括的类型化转向具体的定型化,获得规范与事实的一致。由于罪刑法定在技术上并无制约作用,因此规范解释空白罪状时,重要的是合理运用解释方法,以得出妥善结论,注重目的解释和体系解释可以有效地实现刑法的规范保护任务。
The existence of flexible norm in the incomplete strafrechtsnorm is unavoidable and rational because of generally appointing in the authority lawmaking,the relative of law concept is more obvious,the mutability of sector law deviate the target of the lawmaking norm easily,it is necessary accurate to make an independence norm judgment in the criminal law and distinguish fact problem and law problem. Promoting one two-way corresponding norm interpretation path can achieve the change from general classification to concrete form:patterns,and obtain the balance between the norm and the fact. Because of the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a special crime has no technical restricting function ,so when normative interpret the blank penal code,it is important to use reasonably interpretation method to get the appropriate conclusion. Paying attention to purpose interpretation and system interpretation,will realize the protective mission of penal code norm availably.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期64-72,共9页
The Jurist
基金
2008年度中国人民大学法学院中青年科学研究基金项目“空白刑法的规范解释”的最终研究成果
关键词
空白罪状
规范保护
解释路径
目的解释
体系解释
Incomplete Strafrechtsnorm
Normative Protection
Interpretation Path
Purpose Interpretation
System Interpretation