期刊文献+

法律推理客观性的法理探析

Jurisprudence Analysis of the Objectivity of Legal Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法律推理作为一种规范法律人思维的的技术性工具,其客观性是法治理念在司法操作层面的具体体现。科学地阐释法律推理的客观性内涵,对于完善法律推理理论研究,规范法官的职业思维方式具有重要意义。司法实践中,法律推理客观性的研究应当从纯粹的逻辑分析拓展至价值领域,正确处理两者之间的关系对其客观性的实现起着至关重要的作用。法律推理客观性实现的最理想状态是,形式规则与自由裁量呈现适当高度的动态平衡,两者之间的冲突最少而正面价值最大。 Legal reasoning often acts as a technical tool for regulating lawyers' thought,and the objectivity of it usually reflects the rule of law concept at judicial operational level.Scientific interpretation of the connotation of legal reasoning objectivity is very significant in promoting the theoretical study of legal reasoning and specifying judges' professional way of thinking.In judicial practice,the study of the objectivity of legal reasoning ought to be extended from pure logical analysis to the field of value,and proper handling of their relationship plays a vital role in the realization of the objectivity.The ideal realization of the objectivity of legal reasoning is supposed to be like this: formal rules and discretionary?hold a dynamic balance in appropriate height,and they have the least conflicts and the most positive values.
作者 李丽 于敬
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2010年第3期128-131,共4页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 山东政法学院科研规划课题-<法治视野中的法律推理客观性研究>的中期成果(项目编号:2008Q05B)
关键词 法律推理 客观性 法治 法理分析 Legal reasoning Objectivity Rule of law Jurisprudence analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献6

共引文献293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部