期刊文献+

当代英美证据法学思潮 被引量:4

Modern Anglo-American Evidence Scholarship
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代英美证据法学围绕着"运用证据以证明事实"这一核心问题展开,对此问题的不同回答产生了众多流派,包括现实主义、知识社会学派、新证据法学派、社会心理学派、比较法学派、女性主义证据学派和后现代证据学派,等等,形成了百花齐放、不断创新的局面。当代英美证据法学的每一种思潮或流派都有它对证据法学的贡献,都为证据法学的发展提供了异常重要的立场、视角和方法。 Taking a panoramic view of history of modern Anglo - American evidence scholarship, we may find a main line of thought throughout its history, namely, " how to prove facts with evidence?" All brilliant thoughts and doctrines have given us unique explanations to this core theme, and all arguments and retorts among scholars of evidence law have also been presented as watershed representing different views and positions. Various explanations have led to decen- tralization and dehegemony in the field of modern evidence law and have made evidence scholar- ship become more multi -dimensional.
作者 栗峥
机构地区 清华大学法
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期104-113,共10页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1[美]卡尔·N.卢埃林.《普通法传统》,陈绪纲等译,中国政法大学出版社2002年版,第497页.
  • 2Arne Trankell, Reconstructing the Past : The Role of Psychologist in Criminal Trial, Stockholm : Norstedt, 1982, p. 87.
  • 3Peter L. Berger & Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Anchor Books, 1966 ,pp. 13 - 15.
  • 4J. Maxwell Atkinson, Ethnomethodological Approaches to Socio - legal Studies, in Podgorecki and C.J. Whelan ( eds. ), Sociological Approaches to Law, London : Croom Helm. 1981, pp. 201 - 233.
  • 5Richard Lempert, The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof, 66 B. U. L, Rev 439(1986).
  • 6John D. Jackson, Analyzing the New Evidence Scholarship: Towards a New Conception of the Law of Evidence, Oxford J. L. Stud, Vol. 16,310(1996).
  • 7Alex Stein, Judicial Fact - Finding and the Bayesian Method : The Case for Deeper Scepticism About Their Combination, 1 International Journal of Evidence and Proof, ( 1996), pp. 25 - 47.
  • 8卞建林,王佳.西方司法证明科学的新发展[J].证据科学,2008,16(2):129-137. 被引量:13
  • 9Laurence H. Tribe, Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process, 84 Harv. L, Rev. 1329, 1329 - 1330 ( 1971 ).
  • 10Ronald J. Allen, Rationality, Algorithms and Judicial Proof: A Preliminary Inquiry, 1 International Journal of Proof254 - 275, 258 (1997).

二级参考文献20

  • 1Gilbert Geoffery.The Law of Evidence[]..
  • 2W.D.Evans.A General View of the Decisions of Lord Mansfield in Civil Cases[]..
  • 3.Bayesianism and Juridical Proof[].Interna-tional Journal of Evidence And Proof.1997
  • 4R.D.Friedman.Answering the Bayesian skeptical challenge[].Bayesianism and Ju-ridical ProofInternational Journal of Evidence And Proof.1997
  • 5Alex Stein.Against Free Proof[].ISRAEL LREV.1997
  • 6John H.Wigmore.The problem of proof[].ILLINOIS LREV.1913
  • 7See,L Ray Patterson.Evidence:A Functional Meaning[].VANDLREV.1965
  • 8Douglas N.Walton,Eric C.Krabbe.Commitment in Dialogue:Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning[]..1995
  • 9Frans H.van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst,J.Anthony Blair,and Charles A.Willard.Argumentation:Perspectives andApproaches[]..1987
  • 10Buchanan,&Headrick.Some Speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning[].Stanford LR.1970

共引文献26

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部