期刊文献+

《联合国宪章》解释对传统条约解释规则的影响和发展 被引量:7

The Development and Influence of UN Charter’s Interpretation on Traditional Rule of Treaty Interpretation
原文传递
导出
摘要 条约解释是国际法上的重要问题。1969年《维也纳条约法公约》第31至33条的规定集中体现了传统的条约解释规则。实践中,《联合国宪章》的解释对于传统条约解释规则多有突破和发展,主要体现在三个方面:第一,宪章解释过程中除运用传统方法外,还形成了"暗含权力"和"机构嗣后实践"等新方法;第二,各种传统条约解释方法在运用于宪章时,相互地位关系较之一般条约解释有所不同;最后,存在于条约解释中的解释与修改、解释与新规则创制的关系问题,在宪章解释上体现得尤为突出。宪章自身的特殊性质是形成上述特点的根本原因。宪章解释丰富和发展了传统条约解释理论和实践,为条约解释提供了全新的样本,拓宽了条约解释在现代国际法学研究中的领域。 The interpretation of treaties is a significant issue in international law. The tra- ditional rules of treaty interpretation are embodied in Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty(1969). As a multilateral treaty with marked features, the UN Charter' s interpre- tation has prompted some further developments of the traditional rules of treaty interpretation. These new developments mainly include the following three aspects. First, the creation of new methods of interpretation such as implied powers, the subsequent practices of the UN organs, etc. Secondly, when applied to the UN Charter, various traditional methods of treaty interpretation differ from the general treaty interpretation in terms of their relationships and status. And thirdly, the issue of rela- tionships between the interpretation and modification and between the interpretation and the estab- lishment of new rules as existed in treaty interpretation is reflected sharply in the UN Charter' s in- terpretations. Basically, these developments and features result from the uniqueness of the Charter. The interpretation of the UN Charter has enriched and promoted traditional theories and practices of treaty interpretation, provided us with a brand - new approach to treaty interpretation and broadened the area of treaty interpretation in contemporary international law studies as well.
作者 韩燕煦
机构地区 同济大学法学院
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期135-145,103,共12页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt, ICJ Reports, 19g0, pp. 89 -90.
  • 2Fitzmourice, "The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points", British Yearbook of International Law, 1951, p. 1.
  • 3Francis G. Jacobs, "Varieties of Approach to Treaty Intcrpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference", The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1969, No 1 -2, p. 318 -320.
  • 4Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 656.
  • 5Fitzmaurice, "The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: International Organizations and Tribunals", British Yearbook of International Law, 1952, Vol.. 29, p. 6.
  • 6Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, ICJ Reports, 1949, p. 198.
  • 7Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunals, ICJ Reports, 1954, pp. 80 - 81.
  • 8Tetsuo Sato, Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations: A Critical Analysis of the Interpretative Framework of the Constituent Instruments of the International Organization, Kluwer Law International, 1996, p. 33.
  • 9Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, ICJ Reports, 1949, pp. 180, 182 - 183.
  • 10ICJ Reports, 1948, pp. 69-70.

二级参考文献48

  • 1饶戈平,蔡文海.国际组织暗含权力问题初探[J].中国法学,1993(4):96-105. 被引量:28
  • 2[英]M.阿库斯特.《现代国际法概论》,汪碹、朱奇武等译,中国社会科学出版社,1981版,第297页.
  • 3Ervin P. Hexner, "Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public Intematioonal Organixations", in S. Engel and R. A. Metall, eds., Law, State and International Order, 1964, pp. 1209-130.
  • 4Stuart Ford, Legal Processes of Change: Article 2(4) and the Vienna Convention an the Law of Treaties, Journal of Armed Conflict Law, vo1.4, 1999, p.81.
  • 5Advisory Opinion on Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, ICJ Reports, 1950, p.229.
  • 6ICJ Reports, 1950, p.186.
  • 7Oscar Sehachtex,The Law of the United Nations by Hans Kelzsen, The Yale Law Journal., vol. 60, 1951, p. 193 t
  • 8Robert Jennings and Arthur Watts,eds., Oppenheim' s International Law,ninth edition, vol. 1,1992,p. 1268
  • 9Ervin P. Hexner, "Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public Intematioonal Organixations", in S. Engel and R. A. Metall, eds., Law, State and International Order, 1964, pp. 120 et seq.
  • 10C. F. Amerasinghe,Interpretation of Texts in Open International Organizations, British, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 65,1994, pp. 203 - 204.

共引文献50

同被引文献261

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部