期刊文献+

集体主义价值观在冲突管理中所起的作用——基于一个管理实验的分析 被引量:3

The Roles of Collectivist Values in Conflict Management——Analysis Based on an Experiment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学者们认为集体主义价值观有利于避免组织中冲突,以及有利于冲突的良性演化。本研究采用实验方法,招募80位志愿者参与实验研究。实验结果显示,相比个人主义,集体主义对建立合作目标更有帮助。他们也很自信他们可以一起工作,一起作决策,以提问表达他们对反对意见的理解,接受这些意见的合理之处,以及整合立场来产生一个整合的决策。实验结果挑战集体主义价值观可避免冲突的传统理论,支持最近的一些观念即牢固的人际关系可在决策过程中促进反对意见的有效讨论。 Collectivist values have been thought to be helpful in avoiding organizational conflict, and to induce construct conflict solution. In an experiment with 80 participants at an university in China, the impacts of collectivist values and individualist values are tested on a set of outcomes including integrated decision making and willingness of future cooperation. The results shown that collectivist values, comparing to individualist values, are more helpful in develo- ping cooperation. They were also confident that they could work together and make decisions, sought to understand the opposing position by asking questions, demonstrated that they understood the opposing arguments, accepted these arguments as reasonable, and combined positions to create an integrated decision. Results challenge traditional theorizing that collectivist values lead to conflict avoidance and support recent arguments that strong relationships promote the productive discussion of opposing views in decision-making.
出处 《上海管理科学》 CSSCI 2010年第3期1-6,共6页 Shanghai Management Science
基金 中山大学、岭南(大学)学院提供的研究资助
关键词 集体主义价值观 个人主义价值观 决策 Collectivist values Individualist values Decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ding, D. Z. (1995) In search of determinants of Chinese conflict management styles in joint ventures: An integrated ap proaeh. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Association of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
  • 2Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y.& Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Deeision Processes, 67, 1- 15.
  • 3Heuer, M., Cummings, J. L., & Hutabarat, W. (1999). Cultural stability or change among managers in Indonesia? Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 599-610.
  • 4Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. The Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81- 94.
  • 5Hwang, K. K. (1985). Face and favour: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
  • 6Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN.. Interaction Book Company.
  • 7Lau, D. C. & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
  • 8Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.) New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology. (pp. 640- 675) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • 9Leung, K. , Koch, P. T. & Lu, L. (2002). A dualistic model of harmony and is implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 201-220.
  • 10Oyserman, D. , Coon, H. M, & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部