期刊文献+

冒风险的决策者:聪明乎?糊涂乎? 被引量:3

Is Risk Taking a Clever Decision or a Stupid One?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 决策是对行为的选择——选择做什么或者不做什么,是人类的高级认知活动之一。风险决策特指决策者在对未来情况不完全确定、但是确知各种决策后果以及各种后果出现概率情况下的决策。人们如何进行风险决策,一直是经济学和心理学非常关心的未解之谜。本文尝试从有限理性的角度,分析"齐当别"抉择模型是如何理解、解释人们的风险决策过程,并讨论了"最终的决策只能在单一维度上进行"这一决策规则在现实生活中的旨趣和寓意。 Decision making can be seen as the mental processes resulting in the selection of a course of action a mong several alternatives. Specially, a decision is said to be a risky decision if the decision maker does not know which states of nature will occur but does know their probabilities of occurring. How human minds make risky decisions effectively is one of the most prominent unsolved problems in economics and psychology. From a bounded rational perspec- tive, the present study presented how the equate-to-differentiate model interpreted the underline process of risky decision making. The implication of the rule that " final decision is based on one dimension" in real-world settings is also de scribed and discussed.
出处 《上海管理科学》 CSSCI 2010年第3期32-37,共6页 Shanghai Management Science
关键词 风险决策 有限理性 “齐当别”抉择模型 risky decision bounded rationality e quate-to-differentiate model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economies. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1 -9.
  • 2Allais, P. M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503 -546.
  • 3Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperiales Petropolitanae, 5, 175-192. (Trans. by L. Sommer in Econometrica, 1954, 22, 23-36. ).
  • 4Li, S. (1994). "Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bichoice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk, " (Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1994). Disserta tion Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering. Vol55(4-B), 1658.
  • 5Li, S. (1994). Is there a problem with preference reversals? Psychological Reports. 74, 675-679.
  • 6Li, S. (1998). Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology. 19, 133-153.
  • 7Li, S. (21)04). An alternative way of seeing the Allais-type violations of the sure thing principle. Humanomics. 20( 1 -2), 17- 31.
  • 8Li, S. (2006), Preference reversal; A new look at an old problem, Psychological Record, 56 (3), 411-428.
  • 9Li, S. , & Adams, A. S. (1995). Is there something more im portant behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62, 216-219.
  • 10Kahneman, D. ,& Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

二级参考文献51

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2[1]Allais M. Le comportement de 1' homme mtionnel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine.Econometrica, 1953, 21:503-546
  • 3[2]Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley,1954
  • 4[3]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291
  • 5[4]Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5:297-323
  • 6[5]Allais M. An outline of my main contributions to economic science (Nobel Lecture). Theory and Decision, 1991, 30:1-26
  • 7[6]Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211:453-458
  • 8[7]Li S. Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, 1998, 19:135-155
  • 9[8]Li S. What is wrong with Allais' certainty effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1993, 6:271-281
  • 10[9]Li S, Adams A S. Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 62:216-219

共引文献80

同被引文献91

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部