期刊文献+

球囊扩张椎体成形与椎弓根钉置入内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的效果对比 被引量:5

Effectiveness between kyphoplasty and pedical screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:由于爆裂骨折后椎体后壁不完整,失去了对灌注骨水泥的阻挡保护,胸腰椎爆裂骨折因此成为椎体成形的相对禁忌证。然而在临床过程中常会遇到爆裂骨折患者伴有严重的内科疾病而不能耐受常规的切开复位内固定,此时微创椎体成形可能是患者的惟一选择。目前关于胸腰椎爆裂骨折采用微创椎体成形和椎弓根钉内固定治疗的对比研究还不多。目的:对比观察采用椎弓根钉置入内固定和微创椎体成形治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的效果。方法:北京大学第一医院骨科2005-09/2008-10纳入27例胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者,其中12例开展微创椎体成形治疗,15例采用椎弓根钉内固定治疗。对比观察两组病例的手术时间、治疗后疼痛缓解情况、术中及治疗后不良事件。结果与结论:椎弓根钉置入内固定组手术时间平均55min,固定后5~7d疼痛缓解,疼痛缓解率平均为69.3%,无神经根损伤。球囊扩张椎体成形组手术时间平均37min,治疗后第1日疼痛即出现缓解,疼缓解率平均为86.2%,有3例骨水泥渗漏,但均无神经症状。提示胸腰椎爆裂骨折采用椎弓根钉置入内固定和微创球囊扩张椎体成形均可达到缓解疼痛稳定骨折的目的,采用椎弓根钉内置入固定手术时间长,创伤大;而微创椎体成形术的创伤小、手术时间短,但有一定的骨水泥渗漏危险。虽然胸腰椎爆裂骨折是椎体成形的相对禁忌证,但通过合理使用微创椎体成形术技术,可减少骨水泥的渗漏,从而为爆裂骨折的治疗提供一个新的选择。 BACKGROUND: Following burst fractures, the vertebral posterior wall is not complete, and cannot stop bone cement perfusion. Therefore, thoracolumbar burst fracture has become contraindication of kyphoplasty. However, the patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture are always complicated with severe internal diseases, and cannot undergo conventional open reduction and internal fixation. Minimally invasive kyphoplasty may be the only choice for them. Currently, there are few reports regarding kyphoplasty and pedical screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness between kyphoplasty and pedical screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS: A total of 27 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were selected from Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital between September 2005 and October 2008, including 12 cases treated with kyphoplasty and 15 treated with pedical screw fixation. The operating time, the effect and time of pain relief, the complication in operation and postoperation were evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The mean operating time of pedical screw fixation group was 55 minutes, pain relief was detected on the 5th-7th days postoperatively with a mean relief rate of 69.3%; there was no neural complication in pedical screw fixation group. The mean operating time of kyphoplasty group was 37 minutes, pain was relieved on the first day postoperatively with a mean relief rate of 86.2%; 3 cases developed bone cement leakage but no neural complication in kyphoplasty group. The purpose of pain relief can all be obtained by kyphoplasty and pedical screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, the mean operating time of pedical screw fixation group is longer than that of kyphoplasty group, but bone cement leakage in kyphoplasty group should be considered. Kyphoplasty may be a new choice for thoracolumbar burst fractures.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第22期4131-4134,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Hulme PA,Krebs J,Ferguson SJ,et al.Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty:a systematic review of 69 clinical studies.Spine.2006;31:1983-2001.
  • 2徐世田,李阳,高峰,梅继文,姜洪和,孙海光.经椎弓根人工骨植入并后路椎弓根钉内固定材料置入治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(48):9705-9709. 被引量:4
  • 3Bouza C,Lopez T,Margo A,et al.efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures:a systematic review.Eur Spine J.2006;21:1-18.
  • 4赵坚,林二虎,吴宝玲.球囊扩张椎体后注入丙烯酸树脂骨水泥重建脊柱稳定性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(36):7089-7092. 被引量:3
  • 5Verlaan JJ,van de Kraats EB,Oner FC,et al.Bone displacement and the role of longitudinal ligaments during balloon vertebroplasty in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures.Spine.2005;30(16):1832-1839.
  • 6Korovessis P,Repantis T,Petsinis G,et al.Direct reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures by means of balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate and stabilization with pedicle-screw instrumentation and fusion.Spine.2008;33(4):E100-108.
  • 7Fuentes S,Metellus P,Fondop J,et al.Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.Neurochirurgie.2007;53(4):272-276.
  • 8Carbognin G,Sandri A,Girardi V,et al.Treatment of type-A3 amyelic thoracolumbar fractures (burst fractures) with kyphoplasty:initial experience.Radiol Med.2009; 114(1):133-140.
  • 9Chen JF,Lee ST.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of thoracolumbar spine bursting fracture.Surg Neural.2004;62(6):494-500.
  • 10Korovessis P,Hadjipavlou A,Repantis T.Minimal invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate for burst and severe compression lumbar fractures.Spine.2008;33(6):658-667.

二级参考文献58

共引文献194

同被引文献69

  • 1Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classifica-tion of acutethoracolumbar spinal injuries [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1983,8(8) :817-831.
  • 2Shen W J, Liu T J, Shen Y S. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbarjunction burst fractures without neurologicdeficit [ J ]. Spine ( Phill Pa 1976), 2001,26(9) :1038-1045.
  • 3Ross P D, Davis J W, Epstein R S, et al. Pain and disa- bility associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions[ J ]. J Clin Epide, 1994,47 ( 3 ) : 231- 239.
  • 4王东,杨明连,吴磊,左如俊.非手术治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(11):1085-1086. 被引量:3
  • 5杨长远,王文军,罗光平,肖业生,胡安文,袁泉,向超,刘洪.新型脊柱外固定器联合椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].医学临床研究,2007,24(8):1333-1335. 被引量:16
  • 6何庚水,晏怡果.新型脊柱外固定器联合经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎新鲜骨折[J].南华大学学报(医学版),2007,35(5):744-746. 被引量:4
  • 7李广宇.疼痛程度评估:视觉模拟评分法[N].医药经济报,2011-08-22.
  • 8李继延.基于磷酸钙骨水泥的多孔微球的制备及结构与性能[D].上海:华东理工大学,2013:121-122.
  • 9Smeets R,Kolk A,Gerressen M,et al. A new biphasic os- teoinduetivecalcium composite material with a negative ze- ta potential for boneaugmentation[J]. Head Face Med, 2009,5:13.
  • 10Luo J, Daines L, Charlambous A, et al. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies [J~. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2009,34(26) :2865-2873.

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部