期刊文献+

遗传因素和环境因素对儿童亲社会行为影响的双生子研究 被引量:4

A twin study on genetic and environmental factors of children's prosocial behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 应用双生子设计的定量遗传分析方法探讨遗传因素与环境因素对于儿童亲社会行为的影响.方法 使用长处与困难问卷(strengths and difficulties questionnaire,SDQ)家长版本调查了147对成都地区6~16岁双生子的亲社会行为,使用SPSS13.0统计软件、Mx软件进行描述性统计分析、差异性分析、相关分析及遗传分析.结果 (1)除〈11岁组外,女性亲社会因子得分显著高于男性(P3〈0.05);(2)共享环境因素对儿童亲社会行为的贡献为0.48(95%CI:0.09~0.73),遗传因素的贡献为0.27(95%CI:0~0.66),个体特异性环境因素的贡献为0.25(95%CI:0.18~0.35);(3)女性、家庭实际及理想的亲密度和适应性越好者亲社会行为越好(r:0.17~0.29),而存在孕产期异常情况者、家长管教态度越不一致者亲社会行为越不良(r:-0.16~-0.28).结论 遗传因素和环境因素对儿童的亲社会行为均有影响,年龄和性别与儿童亲社会行为的遗传度相关,影响儿童亲社会行为的环境因素包括家庭功能和教养环境. Objective Using quantitative genetic analysis of twin study design to explore the impact of genetic and environmental factors on the prosocial behaviors of children. Methods One hundred and forty seven twin pairs from Chengdu area aged 6-16 were studied using parental information of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). SPSS13. 0 and Mx software were used to analyze data, including nonparametric test, Pearson correlation, genetic analyses, etc. Results (1) Female children score higher than males on their prosocial behavior (Ps〈0. 05), except the 〈11 age group; (2) Shared environmental factors were the most important for children's prosocial behaviors(C=0. 48,95%CI:0. 09-0. 73),then the genetic factors (A = 0. 27,95%CI:0-0. 66) and the unshared environmental factors(E=0. 25,95%CI:0. 18-0. 35) ; (3) Female and those who scored higher on their fact/ideal family adaptability and cohesion scored higher in their prosocial behaviors (r:0. 17-0. 29). On the contrary, those who had extreme conditions during pregnancy/perinatal period or whose caretaker had discordant opinions on parenting scored lower (r: -0. 16-0. 28). Conclusion Children's prosocial behaviors were influenced by genetic and environmental factors including family function and parenting environment, and genetic impact differs in different age and sex.
出处 《中华医学遗传学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期324-328,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
基金 国家自然科学基金(30470625,30570654)
关键词 双生子研究 亲社会行为 定量遗传分析 twin study prosocial behavior quantitative genetic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Gregory AM,Light-hausermann JH,Rijsdijk F,et al.Behavioral genetic analyses of prosocial behavior in adolescents.Dev Sci,2009,12:165-174.
  • 2Goodman R.Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2001,40:1337-1345.
  • 3Klasen H,Woerner W,Wolke D,et al.Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist.Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2000,9:271-276.
  • 4刘书君,黄颐,邓先华,唐娴,谢玲,金敏,沈峰,高代林,李茜茜,孙学礼.中文版长处和困难量表的初步因子分析[J].华西医学,2006,21(2):295-296. 被引量:11
  • 5汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册.增订版.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.127-130.
  • 6Yang MJ,Tzeng CH,Tseng JY,et al.Determination of twin zygosity using a commercially available STR analysis of 15 unlinked loci and the gender-determining marker amelogenin-a preliminary report.Hum Reprod.2006,21:2175-2179.
  • 7Plomin R,DeFries JC,McClearn GE,et al.Behavioral genetics.4th ed.New York:Worth Publishers,2001.11-40.
  • 8Lemery KS,Goldsmith HH.Genetic and environmental influences on preschool sibling cooperation and conflict:associations with difficult temperament and parenting style.Marriage Fami Rev,2002,33! 77-99.
  • 9Stevenson J.The genetic basis of personality.In:Cooper C,Varma V eds.Processes in individual differences.1st ed.London:Routledge,1997.39-58.
  • 10Zahn-Waxier C,Schiro K,Robinson JL,et al.Empathy and prosocial patterns in young MZ and DZ twins:development and genetic and environmental influences.In:Emde RN,Hewitt JK eds.Infancy to early childhood:Genetic and environmental influences on developmental change.1st ed.New York:OxfordUniversity Press,2001.141-162.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Garralda ME,Yates P,Higginson I.Child and adolescent mental health service use:HoNOSCA as an outcome measure[J].Br J Psychiatry,2000,177:52-58.
  • 2Goodman R,Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.American Academy of Child and Adolescent[J].Psychiatry,2000,40(11):1337-1345.
  • 3Goodman R.The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire:a research note[J].J Child Psychiatry,1997,38:581-586.
  • 4Goodman R,Meltaer H,Bailey V.The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire:a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version[J].Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1998,7:125-130.
  • 5Goodman R,Ford T,Simmons H,Gatward R,Meltzer H.Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample[J].Br J Psychiatry,2000,177:534-539.
  • 6Goodman R,Renfrew D,Mullick M.Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka[J].Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2000,9:129-134.

共引文献40

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部