期刊文献+

恶性浆细胞病出血与血栓形成的发病机制和处理 被引量:2

Pathogenesis and Management of Hemorrhage and Thrombosis in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias——Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由治疗多发性骨髓瘤的高效免疫调节药物沙利度胺和雷利度胺(lenolidomide)诱发的静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)发生率高,引起了对恶性浆细胞病患者VTE的发生率和潜在的病理生理学以及血栓预防措施的关注。而在淋巴增殖性疾患患者出血并发症相对少见。典型的发生在意义未明单克隆免疫球蛋白病的获得性血管性血友病综合征(AVWS)和原发性淀粉样变相关的获得性凝血异常两者的处理正面临挑战。本文纵览恶性浆细胞病重要的止血相关并发症,并复习了可影响克隆性浆细胞病诊断和治疗处理的其他不常见的出血和血栓性事件。由于这些止血并发症大多数不常见,相关信息来自病例回顾或系列分析。 Unexpectedly high rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) induced by highly effective immune modulating drugs thalidomide and lenolidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma have focused attention on the incidence and underlying pathophysiology of VTE in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias, and on thromboprophylaxis approaches. While bleeding complications are relatively uncommon in the patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, typically occurring in the patients with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, and acquired coagulopathies associated with primary amyloidosis can present with haemorrhagic complications and both are challenges to the managemert. This review highlights these important haemostasis-related complications of plasma cell dyscrasias and provides an overview of other uncommon bleeding and thrombotic events that can affect diagnosis and therapeutic management of clonal plasma cell disorders. Due to the infrequency of most these haemostasis complications, available information is typically based on retrospective cases or series analysis.
作者 王学文
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第3期809-815,共7页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
关键词 恶性浆细胞病 多发性骨髓瘤 获得性血管性血友病综合征 血栓形成 出血 plasma cell dyscrasia multiple myeloma acquired von Willebrand syndrome thrombosis haemorrhage
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Menke MN, Feke GT, McMeel JW, et al. Hyperviscosity-related retinopathy in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Arch Ophthalmol, 2006;124(11) : 1601 - 1606.
  • 2Sucker C, Hetzel GR, Grabensee B, et al. Amyloidosis and bleeding: pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy. Am J Kidney Dis, 2006;47(6) : 947 -955.
  • 3Sanders JT, Wyatt RJ. IgA nephropathy and Henoch-Schonlein purpua nephritis. Curt Opin Pediatr,2008; 20(2) : 163 -170.
  • 4Rossi D, De Paoli L, Franceschetti S, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of immune thrombocytopenic purura in a cohort of monoclonal gammopatlay of tmcertain significance. Br J Haematol, 2007 ; 138 (2) : 249 - 252.
  • 5Teng HW, Chen PM, Yang YH, et al. The prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time at diagnosis indicates less favorable prognosis in IgA myeloma. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2007 ;37 (8) : 609 -614.
  • 6Kotlin R, Sobotkova A, Riedel T, et al. Acquired dysfibrinogenemia secondary to multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol, 2008; 120(2) :75 -81.
  • 7Torjemane L, Guermazi S, Labeb S, et al. Heparin-like anticoagulant associated with multiple myeloma and neutralized with protamine sulfate. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2007 ; 18 ( 2 ) : 279 -281.
  • 8Eby C. Pathogenesis and management of bleeding and thrombosis in plasma cell dyscrasias. Br J Haematol,2009 ; 145 ( 2 ) : 151 - 163.
  • 9Gamba G, Montani N, Anesi E, et al. Clotting alterations in primary systemic amyloidosis. Haematologica, 2000 ; 85 ( 2 ) : 289 - 292.
  • 10Mumford A, O'Donnell J, Gillmore J, et al. Bleeding symptoms and coagulation abnormalities in 337 patients with AL-amyloidosis. Br J Haematol, 2000 ; 110 (2) :454 - 460.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med ,2006 ;354( 13 ) : 1362 - 1369.
  • 2Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Melton LJ, et al. Monoclonal garnmopathy of undetermined significance: estimated incidence and duration prior to recognition. Blood, 2007 ; 110 : 79a ( Abstract # 246 ).
  • 3Vanderschueren S, Mylle M, Dierckx D, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance: significant beyong hematology. Mayo Clin Proc,2009 ;84 (9) : 842 - 845.
  • 4Bida JP, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Disease association with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A population-based study of 17398 patients. Mayo Clin Proc ,2009 ;84 (8) :685 -693.
  • 5Bird J, Behrens J,Westin J, et al. UK Myeloma Fotum(UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) : guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M-proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undertermined significance ( MGUS ). Br J Haematol, 2009;147( 1 ) :22 -42.
  • 6Landgren O, Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among men in Ghana. Mayo Clin Proc 2007 ;82 ( 12 ) : 1468 - 1473.
  • 7Landgren O, Kyle RA, Hoppin JA, et al. Pesticide exposure and risk of monoclonal garnmopathy of undetermined significance in the Agricultural Health Study. Blood, 2009 ; 113 (25) : 6386 - 6391.
  • 8Vachon CM, Kyle RA, Themeau TM, et al. Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood,2009 ; 114 (4) :785 - 790.
  • 9Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Long-term follow- up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later. Mayo Clin Proc, 2004 ;79 (7) : 859 - 866.
  • 10Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med, 2002 ;346 ( 8 ) :564 - 569.

同被引文献30

  • 1Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med ,2006 ;354( 13 ) : 1362 - 1369.
  • 2Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Melton LJ, et al. Monoclonal garnmopathy of undetermined significance: estimated incidence and duration prior to recognition. Blood, 2007 ; 110 : 79a ( Abstract # 246 ).
  • 3Vanderschueren S, Mylle M, Dierckx D, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance: significant beyong hematology. Mayo Clin Proc,2009 ;84 (9) : 842 - 845.
  • 4Bida JP, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Disease association with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A population-based study of 17398 patients. Mayo Clin Proc ,2009 ;84 (8) :685 -693.
  • 5Bird J, Behrens J,Westin J, et al. UK Myeloma Fotum(UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) : guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M-proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undertermined significance ( MGUS ). Br J Haematol, 2009;147( 1 ) :22 -42.
  • 6Landgren O, Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among men in Ghana. Mayo Clin Proc 2007 ;82 ( 12 ) : 1468 - 1473.
  • 7Landgren O, Kyle RA, Hoppin JA, et al. Pesticide exposure and risk of monoclonal garnmopathy of undetermined significance in the Agricultural Health Study. Blood, 2009 ; 113 (25) : 6386 - 6391.
  • 8Vachon CM, Kyle RA, Themeau TM, et al. Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood,2009 ; 114 (4) :785 - 790.
  • 9Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Long-term follow- up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later. Mayo Clin Proc, 2004 ;79 (7) : 859 - 866.
  • 10Kyle RA, Themeau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med, 2002 ;346 ( 8 ) :564 - 569.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部