期刊文献+

直肠癌低位前切除Proximate~与GF-1管状吻合器吻合临床对比研究

Comparison between Proximate ILS and GF-1 circular staplers for low anterior resetion of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同吻合器对直肠癌低位前切除术吻合口的影响。方法回顾性分析比较209例直肠癌低位前切除采用Proximate与GF-1管状吻合器吻合病例资料。结果采用Proximate管状吻合器吻合残端完整100例,吻合口复发1例,GF-1管状吻合器吻合残端完整71例,吻合口复发7例,两组差异显著;手术时间、临时性粪便转流、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄、吻合口出血两组无显著差异。结论在直肠癌低位前切除中采用管状吻合器吻合是安全可靠的,而Proximate管状吻合器使用更方便,优于GF-1管状吻合器。 Objective To assess the effectiveness of different staplers on the anastomosis in low anterior resection of rectal cancer.Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on the consecutive data of 209 patients with rectal cancer,who underwent low anterior resection using Proximate ILS or GF-1 circular stapler.Results In the patients with Proximate ILS circular stapler,complete tissue rings were found in 100 patients and local recurrence of anastomosis was found in 1 patients in the period of follow-up.The counterparts of the patients with GF-1 circular stapler were 71 and 7.There were significant diffierences the indexes between the two groups.There were no significant diffierences in operating time,temporary fecal diversion,anastomotic fistula,anastomotic stenosis and anastomotic bleeding between the two groups.Conclusion The application of stapler to low anterior resection of rectal cancer is safe,and Proximate ILS stapler is a more reliable and effective instrument than GF-1 stapler.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2010年第3期360-362,共3页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 直肠 低位前切除 吻合器 rectal cancer low anterior resection stapler
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1邵永孚,吴铁成,单毅,吴健雄,周志祥,徐立斌,王滨.直肠癌前切除吻合器吻合652例的疗效分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(1):30-32. 被引量:41
  • 2郁宝铭.低位直肠癌时手术方式的选择[J].腹部外科,1994,7(1):10-12. 被引量:14
  • 3Schroen AT, Cress RD. Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study. Ann Surg, 2001, 234:641-651.
  • 4Polglase AL, McMurrick PJ, Tremayne AB, et al. Local recurrence after curative anterior resection with principally blunt dissection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44:947-954.
  • 5Bonadeo FA, Vaccaro CA, Benati ML, et al. Rectal cancer: local recurrence after surgery without radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44:374-379.
  • 6Law WL, Chu KW. Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2001,88:1607-1612.
  • 7Mkel JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection witn rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003,46:653-660.
  • 8Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, et al. Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43:951-955.
  • 9Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 1998,85:355-358.
  • 10Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, et al. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45:1164-1171.

共引文献191

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部