期刊文献+

英语专业学生听力策略实证研究 被引量:4

An Experimental Study of Listening Strategies Used by Freshmen English Majors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究的主要目的是调查我国英语专业一年级学生元认知策略、认知策略和社会情感策略的使用情况,发现其中的问题,为一二年级的听力教学提供指导。主要研究问题包括:1)三类听力策略的总体使用情况;2)听力成绩与三类听力策略之间的关系;3)高、低两个水平组在使用三类听力策略方面的差异。研究发现:一年级学生认知策略使用率最高,其次是元认知策略和社会情感策略;声音、上下文、关键词等认知策略、情感策略与听力成绩显著正相关,翻译策略与听力成绩显著负相关,根据认知策略的运用,可在一定程度上预测学生的听力成绩;高、低水平两组学生在三大策略的使用方面存在显著差异,高分组学生比低分组学生能更好地使用部分认知策略和情感策略,低分组学生更倾向于运用翻译、迁移等认知策略。这说明部分外语学习者之所以听力成绩优异是源于能够有效地使用部分认知策略,因此,低年级听力教师应该注意培养学生运用认知策略的能力。 This study reports on an empirical study of listening strategies used by freshman English majors.The three categories of strategies involved are cognitive strategies,metacognitive strategies and social and affective strategies respectively.Three issues are to be addressed: 1) the frequency of strategy use;2) the correlation between the listening strategies and proficiency;3) the difference of strategy employment between high and low achievers.The findings identify that freshman English majors use more cognitive strategies than metacognitive and social and affective strategies,and that cognitive strategies such as contextualization,auditory representation and Key words and so on,and affective strategies are positively related to listening results while cognitive strategies like translation and transfer are negatively related to listening achievements.The results also indicate that high and low achievers differ in employing strategies,the former using effectively some cognitive and affective strategies while the latter relying more on cognitive strategies like translation and transfer.This suggests that the reason why high achievers outperform low achievers lies in their effective use of cognitive strategies.It is advisable therefore that appropriate cognitive strategies should be taught to freshman English majors in listening classes.
作者 李向东
出处 《青海民族大学学报(教育科学版)》 2010年第3期106-111,共6页 Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College
基金 西安外国语大学科研基金资助项目(08XWC12)
关键词 听力策略 听力成绩 相关性 差异 listening strategy listening proficiency correlation difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献84

共引文献2722

同被引文献32

  • 1王宇.关于中国非英语专业学生听力策略的调查[J].外语界,2002(6):5-12. 被引量:206
  • 2文秋芳.英语学习成功者与不成功者在方法上的差异[J].外语教学与研究,1995,27(3):61-66. 被引量:1153
  • 3季佩英,贺梦依.大学英语师生听力策略研究[J].外语界,2004(5):40-46. 被引量:109
  • 4吴道存.怎样教好英语[M].人民教育出版社,1993.
  • 5Ellis, R.The Study of Second Language Acquisition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1994:463-693.
  • 6O’Malley JM,Chamot AU,Kupper L.Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisitionApplied Linguistics,1989.
  • 7Morley, Joan. Listening Comprehension in Second/ Foreign Language Instruction [M].Newbury House, 1991:87.
  • 8Nunan, David. Langalage Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers[M]. Prentice Hall, 1991:20-21.
  • 9Rod Ellis. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai Foreign Language Teaching Press, 1999:529-530.
  • 10张殿玉,刘晓玲,马占祥“一条龙”英语教学中的学习策略研究[J].大学英语教学,2010,(3):28-30.

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部