期刊文献+

立法论证的基本方法 被引量:2

Basic Methods of Legislation Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 立法论证是对立法资源进行有效调控的重要手段和形式,对于增强立法的科学性、产出质量优良的法和保证法的实施至关重要。好的论证离不开正确的方法。逻辑、修辞和对话的方法均适用于立法论证,此外还有一种实证的方法,强调通过实践理性达到论证目的。 Legislation reasoning is an important means and form of efficient control over legislative resources and it is of great signif icance to strengthen scientif icness of legislation, to make high-quality laws and to assure their application. Only with correct method can effective reasoning be realized. Logic, rhetoric and dialogue are all suitable for legislation reasoning. Besides, there is another one called empirical method, which aims to reach the reasoning goal by practical reasoning.
作者 王爱声
出处 《北京政法职业学院学报》 2010年第2期32-35,共4页 Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词 立法 论证 基本方法 legislation reasoning basic method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[比利时]卢卡·温特根斯(王保民译).《一种新的立法理论-立法法理学》[J].立法研究,2005,5.
  • 2[英]休谟(北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译).《人类理智研究》,《西方哲学原著选读》(上卷),商务印书馆1981年版,第524页.
  • 3杨贝.《法律论证的修辞学传统》,法律方法与法律思维网:http://www2.scut.edu.cn/juris/publish/news/falvxiuci/3dsgu4c16je4jm.html.
  • 4武宏志.法律逻辑和论证逻辑的互动[J].法商研究,2006,23(5):153-160. 被引量:17

二级参考文献18

  • 1See Douglas Walton, Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law, New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 6-9, pp. 54-63.
  • 2Ronald P. Loui, A Citation--Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument, Argumentation, Vol. 16 (2002) ,No. 3. p. 260.
  • 3See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2003(Updated ed. ), pp. 12-13, p. 15.
  • 4See Stephen Toulmin, Richard Rieke and Allan Janik, An Introduction to Reasoning, New York . Macmillan, 1979, p. 78, p.78, pp. 203-309.
  • 5See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999(Reprinted), p. 7, p. 42, p.43, p. 255, pp. 94-141.
  • 6See David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij, The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work Using Stephen Edelston Toulmin's Layout of Arguments, Argumentation, Vol. 19(2005),No. 3, p. 255.
  • 7See R. Schmidt, Influence of the Legal Paradigm, in Peter Murphy ed. , Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources, New York:Oxford University Press Inc, 2003, pp. 103-105, pp. 293-298, p. 289.
  • 8See David Hitchcock, The practice of argumentative discussion, Argumentation,Vol. 16 (2002), No. 3. p. 291, pp. 78-80, p.162.
  • 9See Ralph H. Johnson, Manifest Rationalty, A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,2000, p. 45.
  • 10See Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic :Conversational Contexts of Argument, Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 1998.

共引文献16

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部