期刊文献+

石化企业突发环境风险评价与分级方法研究 被引量:48

Assessment and management of accidental environmental risks in the petro-chemical industry
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了降低环境污染事故发生频率,急需建立科学高效的环境风险管理体系,而环境风险评估与分级技术是进行环境风险分级管理的前提和基础.本研究在对石化企业环境风险特征分析的基础上,构建了基于危险物质、生产工艺、设备设施、企业管理、企业布局的石化企业突发环境风险综合评价指标体系,并建立了相应的风险评价模型.同时,提出了4级风险分级管理体系,并在此基础上以长江下游某化工园区为例进行研究.结果表明,在园区30家石化企业中,存在特大环境风险的企业有1家,重大环境风险的企业2家,占企业总数的10%.本研究提出的石化企业风险评价指标体系及评价、分级方法科学可行,能够为石化企业风险管理提供决策依据. In order to decrease and avoid environmental pollution accidents,it is necessary to establish an effective environmental risk management system. Environmental risk assessment and classification is a necessary step in the system. Considering the thousands of petro-chemical enterprises in China and their great environmental risk,we first examine the environmental risk characteristics of the petro-chemical industry. Then,we provide an integrated environmental risk assessment system for the petro-chemical industry which includes five indicators:hazardous substances,production processes,equipment,environmental management and plant location. On the basis of the above,we apply this system to a chemical industrial park downstream of the Yangtze River where there are three petro-chemical plants with the highest risk levels according to the analysis. The proportion of highest environmental risk plants is 10%. The results show that the environmental risk assessment and classification system is reasonable and it will benefit the environmental risk management of the petro-chemical industry.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期1510-1517,共8页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(No.2007AA06A404 2007AA06A405) 国家自然科学青年基金(No.40901266)~~
关键词 石化行业 环境风险 环境风险评价 环境风险管理 petro-chemical industry environmental risk environmental risk assessment environmental risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Achour M H, Haroun A E, Schult C J, et al. 2005. A new method to assess the environmental risk of a chemical process [ J ]. Chemical Engineering and Processing,44 ( 8 ) : 901--909.
  • 2American Institute of Chemical Engineers. 1994. Dow's Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classifieation Guide (7^th Edition)[ M ]. NewYork: Malden Wiley-AlChE. 54-55.
  • 3Cave S R, Edwards D W. 1997. Chemical process route selection based on assessment of inherent environmental hazard [ J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 21 ( Supplement 1 ) : 965-970.
  • 4Dokas I M, Karras D A, Panagiotakopoulos D C. 2009. Fault tree analysis and fuzzy expert systems: Early warning and emergency response of landfill operations [ J ]. Environmental Modeling & Software, 24 ( 1 ) : 8-25.
  • 5杜喜臣,蔡敏琦.液氨泄漏事故树分析及风险预测[J].环境工程学报,2008,2(10):1430-1432. 被引量:15
  • 6Henand A. 2009. Dealing with uncertainty and pursuing superior technology options in risk management-The inherency risk analysis [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164 (2-3) : 995-1003.
  • 7Heller S. 2006. Managing industrial risk -- Having a tested and proven system to prevent and assess risk [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130(1-2) : 58-65.
  • 8胡二邦 彭理通 陆雍森 等.环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999..
  • 9胡海军,程光旭,禹盛林,王玉亮,杜阡陌.一种基于层次分析法的危险化学品源安全评价综合模型[J].安全与环境学报,2007,7(3):141-144. 被引量:25
  • 10Khan F I, Husain T, Abbasi S A. 2001. Safety weighted hazard index (SWeHI): A new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard identification and safety evaluation in chemical process industries [ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 79 (2) :65-80.

二级参考文献83

共引文献965

同被引文献493

引证文献48

二级引证文献285

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部