期刊文献+

幼儿对图画风格及图画作者特质与作品关系的认知 被引量:2

Young Children's Understanding of the Relationship Between the Trait of Painters and the Style of Drawings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选用两组不同风格的图画作品,考察了在提供图画范例和提供图画作者特质故事的条件下,5、6岁儿童对图画作品风格及图画作者特质与作品关系的认知。结果表明:5岁儿童已经能够感知图画的某些风格,但对感知线索的选择能力还有待发展,6岁儿童对图画风格识别的准确程度显著高于5岁儿童;儿童对画家特质及其与作品问联系的理解在5-6岁间经历了从随机匹配到效价匹配再到特质匹配的发展过程。 To examine young children's cognition of the relations between the style of drawings and the personal traits of their painters, 5-to 6-year old children were told to match the pictures according to style or trait ("rough- cautious" and "imaginativerealistic"). The participants were randomly assigned into two different conditions, provided either with example drawings or trait stories. The results showed that children at the age of 5 could recognize a certain style of a picture while this ability was ready for further development and the understanding of the painter's trait increased children's sensitivity to the painting style. At the age of 5- 6, children's cognition of the relations between a painter's trait and his works witnessed a rapid development from randomly matching to matching by value and finally to matching by trait.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期588-592,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 图画风格 特质 认知发展 personal trait, painting style, matching strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Gardner H. Children's sensitivity to painting style. Child Development, 1970, 41. 813-821.
  • 2Callaghan T C, MacFarlane j M. An attentional analysis of children ' s sensitivity to artistic style in painting. Developmental Science, 2000, 1 (2) : 307 - 313.
  • 3Steinberg D, DeLoache J S. Preschool children' s sensitivity to artistic style in paintings. Visual Arts Research, 1986, 12. 1 - 10.
  • 4Callaghan T C. Rochat P. Trace of the artist: Sensitivity to the role of the artist in children' s pictorial reasoning. British Journal of developmental Psychology, 2003, 21. 415 - 445.
  • 5郭力平,王晓蕾,王顺妹,黄燕.早期儿童关于图画与其所指物间关系的理解——利用两可图进行的考察[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):61-65. 被引量:6
  • 6Yuill N, Pearson A. The Development of bases for trait attribution: Understanding of trait as causal mechanisms based on desire. Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34: 574-586.
  • 7Parsons, M. J. How we understand art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 71.

二级参考文献7

  • 1郭力平,王晓蕾,王顺妹.利用倒转图考察儿童认知发展的初步研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):850-854. 被引量:9
  • 2Rochat P, Callaghan T. What drives symbolic development In:L. Namy. (Ed.) Symbolic use and understanding. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2003
  • 3Gopnik A, Rosati A. Duck or rabbit Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. Developmental Science, 2001, 4(2): 175-183
  • 4Ropar D, Mitchell P, Ackroyd K. Do children with autism find it difficult to offer alternative interpretations to ambiguous figures British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2003, 21:387-395
  • 5Gopnik A, Slaughter V, Meltzoff A. Changing your views: how understanding visual perception can lead to a new theory of mind. In: C. Lewis & P. Mitchell. (eds.) Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994: 157-181
  • 6Carpendale J I, Chandler M J. On the distinction between false belief understanding and subscribing to an interpretive theory of mind. Child Development, 1996,67: 1686-1706
  • 7Barquero B, Robinson E J, Thomas G V. Children's ability to attribute different interpretations of ambiguous drawings to a naive vs. a biased observer. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2003, 27 (5):445-456

共引文献5

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部