期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

现代效度理论与效验方法述评 被引量：7

A Review of Modern Validity Theory and Test Validation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文主要探讨基于现代效度理论——效度整体观的背景下如何验证效度的问题。效度整体观认为效度是一个整体概念,构念是核心,但效验证据是来自多方面的。效验就是搜集并评价效度证据的过程。Kane的基于论证的效验方法与Weir的基于证据的社会认知效验框架都强调"循证"过程,为心理与教育测量的效验实践提供了一种方法学路径。 This paper focused on discussing the validation of the theory on modern validity-the unified conception of validity. Construct validity as the basis for the unified validity can be evaluated through anaiyzing more sources of evidence. Validation is the process of accumulating and the evaluating the evidence. The argument-based approach to validation and evidence-based socialcognitive framework for validating tests provide a methodology or technology for validation, which both emphasize the ＂evidencebased＂ approach.
作者 关丹丹 车宏生
机构地区 北京师范大学心理学院 教育部考试中心
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期654-656,653,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 效度 效验 证据 循证法 validity, validation, evidence, evidence-based approach
分类号 B841 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1孙晓敏,张厚粲.效度概念演进及其新发展[J].心理科学,2004,27(1):234-235. 被引量：31
  • 2Guerrero M. D. The unified validity of the four skills exam: applying Messick' s framework. Language Testing, 2000, 17 (4) : 397 - 421.
  • 3weir c. j. Language Testing and Validation. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2005 : 43 215.
  • 4Wolf M. et al. Validity issues in assessing English language learners' language proficiency. Educational Assessment,2008,13(2-3): 80-107.
  • 5Messick S. Validity. In: R. L. L inn (Ed.) . Educational Measurement. New York: American Council on Education / Macmillan publishing Co. (3rd ed. ) ,1989; 13 - 103.
  • 6Messick S, Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 1995(9) : 941 - 945.
  • 7AERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA,1999:1- 174.
  • 8Kane M. T. An argument - based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 1992,112 : 527 - 535.
  • 9Kane M. T. Validity. In R. L. L inn ( Ed. ) , Educational Measurement. New York: American Council on Education / Macmillan publishing Co. (4th ed. ) ,2006:17 - 60.
  • 10Kane M. T. Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001,38 (4) : 319 - 342.

二级参考文献56

  • 1American Psychological Association. Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques. Washington, DC:Author, 1954:15.
  • 2American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests and Manuals.Washington, DC: Author. 1966:23.
  • 3American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education.Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington,DC: Author. 1999:54.
  • 4Winter G. A Comparative Discussion of the Notion of Validity in Qualitative and Quantitative Researches. The Qualitative Reports.2000, 4:3-4.
  • 5Bingham W V. Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing. New York:Harper & Brothers, 1937:3.
  • 6Guilford J P. New Standards for Test Evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1946, 6 : 427 - 439.
  • 7Linn, R. L. 1997. Evaluating the validity of assessments: The consequences of use [J]. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice 16 (2) : 14-16.
  • 8Messick, S. 1988. The once and future issues of validity: assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement [A]. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (eds.). Test Validity [C]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun.
  • 9Messick, S. 1989. Validity [A]. In R. L. Linn (ed.). Educational Measurement (3rd edition) [C]. New York : Macmillan.
  • 10Messick, S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequence in the validation of performance assessments [J]. Educational Researcher 23 (2) :13-23

共引文献122

同被引文献98

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

心理科学
2010年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部