期刊文献+

矩阵推理测验中的错误类型分析 被引量:2

Error Analysis in Matrix Reasoning Tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 计算机自动化项目生成已逐渐被用来应对矩阵推理测验曝光的问题,然而对诱选项该如何设置却没有很好的文献支持。现有与矩阵推理测验(如瑞文测验)相关的大量研究中,研究者都只使用正确作答数或者错误率,对个体所犯错误信息的深入探查较少。通过对340名大学生在矩阵推理测验作答时产生的错误答案的编码分析,发现可将所有被试的错误模型分成4种类型,其中出现最多的是不完整解答错误(IC),忽视项目涉及的部分规则。中高能力者的错误都集中在IC类型上,而低能力者在四种错误类型上的分布相对平均些。这一结果支持了矩阵推理测验的认知模型,也为计算机自动化项目生成的诱选项编制提供参考。 Computerized automatic item generation (AIG) was gradually employed in dealing with item exposure in matrix reasoning tests. However, how to design better distracters was still unclear. Most studies related to matrix reasoning tests (MRT, represented by Raven Matrices) used total number correct or incorrect rates as the variables of interest, but few conducted analysis of the types of errors that individuals made. In the present study, 340 undergraduates were asked to give answers to 24 MRT items, and wrong responses were coded and analyzed. The results indicated that all of their errors could be classifled into four categories, among which the most frequent was the incomplete solution error ( i. e. , omitting some rules). Errors made by participants witb high or medium ability were mainly IC while errors of low-ability participants were nearly averagely distributed in four types. The results not only partly supported the cognitive model of MRT, but also helped design distracters in computerized AIG.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期663-665,共3页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 南京大学人才引进培养基金(项目编号010922410108) 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室(北京师范大学)开放研究课题的资助
关键词 矩阵推理测验 计算机自动化项目生成 错误分析 诱选项 工作记忆 Matrix reasoning tests, computerized automatic item generation, error analysis, distracter, working memory
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Winfred, A. J, Day. D. V. Development of a short form for the Raven Advaneed Progressive Matriees Test Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1994,54 (2) : 394 - 403.
  • 2Arendasy, M. Automatic generation of Rasch - calibrated items: Figural matrices re-st GEOM and Endless - Loops Test Ec. International Journal of Testing, 2005, 5(3) : 197 - 224.
  • 3Rao, C, Sinharay, S. Handbook of Statistics: Psychometrics (Vol. 26) : Elsevier, 2007:747- 768.
  • 4Embretmn, S. E. A cognitive design system approach to generating valid test: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3(3) : 380 - 396.
  • 5Irvine, S. H, Kyllonen P. C. Item generation for test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2002 : 219 - 250.
  • 6Freund, P. A, Hofer. S, Holling, H. Explaining and controlling for the psychometric properties of computer - generated figural matrix items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008,32 ( 3 ) : 195 - 210.
  • 7李中权,张厚粲.计算机自动化项目生成概述[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(2):348-352. 被引量:7
  • 8Carpenter, P. A, Just, M. A, Shell. P. What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 1990, 97 (3) : 404 - 431.
  • 9Primi, R. Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks: Contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 2001, 30.(1) 41-70.
  • 10Meo, M, Roberts, M. J, Marucei, F. S. Element salience as a predictor of item difficulty for Raven' s Progressive Matrices. Intelligence, 2007, 35(4) :359 - 368.

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:50
  • 2Mislevy R J.Foundations of a new test theory.In:N.Frederiksen,et al.,Eds.Test theory for a new generation of tests.Hillsdale,NJ:LEA,1993.19-39.
  • 3Snow R E.Aptitude processes.In:R.E.Snow,Pat-anthony Federico,Montague W E,Eds.Aptitude,learning and instruction-Volume 1:Cognitive process analyses of aptitude.Lawrence Erlbaum associates,1980.27-63.
  • 4Bethell-Fox C E,Lohman D F,Snow R E.Adaptive reasoning:componential and eye movement analysis of geometric analogy performance.Intelligence,1984,8:205-238.
  • 5Vodegel Matzen L.Performance on Raven's progressive matrices:what makes a difference?Unpublished dissertation,universiteit van Amsterdam.Amsterdanm,Netherlands.1994.
  • 6Mulholland T M,Pellegrino J W,Glaser R.Components of geometric analogy solution.Cognitive psychology,1980,12:252-284.
  • 7Whitely S E,Schneder L M.Information structure on geometric analogies:A test theory approach.Applied Psychological Measurement,1981,5:383-397.
  • 8Diehl K A.Algorithmic item generation and problem solving strategies in matrix completion problems.Unpublished Dissertation,university of Kansas.2002.
  • 9Bennett R E. Using new teclmology to improve assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1999, 18(3): 5-12.
  • 10Hambleton R K. Theory, methods, and practices in testing for the 21st century. Psicothema, 2004, 16(4): 696-701.

共引文献13

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部