期刊文献+

非对称任务下社会动机对多边谈判策略和结果的影响 被引量:2

The Effects of Social Motivation on Asymmetrical Multilateral Negotiations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会动机是谈判研究中一个非常重要的变量,本研究关注的是非对称谈判任务条件下,谈判者混合社会动机对谈判策略和结果的影响。研究采用2×3实验设计,以联盟内外谈判者的社会动机为自变量,谈判策略和谈判结果为因变量进行实验室模拟谈判研究,结果表明:(1)少数方和多数方的社会动机对谈判策略有显著影响;(2)少数方和多数方的社会动机对谈判联合结果存在着二阶交互作用;(3)少数方社会动机对谈判的质量影响显著,多数方社会动机对谈判的质量影响不显著。 Social motivation plays an important role in negotiation research. The paper intended to investigate how the negotiators mixed social motivation affected the process and outcome of multilateral negotiation in an asymmetrical task structure. Majority social motivation and minority social motivation were designed as the independent variables and the negotiation strategies included integrative and distributed ones, and the negotiation outcomes were designed as dependent variables in these 2 ×3 laboratory simulation experiments. The main conclusions of this study included: (1) Majority social motivation and minority social motivation had significant rnain effects on negotiation strategies; (2) Majority social motivation and minority social motivation had a two-way interaction effect on negotiation outcomes; (3)Minority social motivation had a significant effect on the negotiation quality while the effect of majority social motivation on negotiation quality was not significant.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期701-704,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70671090)
关键词 非对称任务 社会动机 多边谈判 asymmetry, social motivation, multilateral negotiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1McClintoek C. Social motives in settings of outcome interdependence. In: D Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspective, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,1977. 49- 77.
  • 2B., & De Dreu, C. K.W. Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule and social motive. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, March: 227-252.
  • 3Van Beest, I. , Van Dijk, E. , De Dreu, C.K.W. , & Wilke, H. A.M. Do - no - harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2005, 41:609-617.
  • 4De Dreu, C. K. W., & Boles, T. Share and share alike or winner take all? Impact of social value orientation on the choice and recall of decision heuristics in negotiation. Organizational Behavior 'and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76: 253- 267.
  • 5张嫒.社会动机、任务结构、交流媒介对多边谈判策略及其结果的影响.硕士论文,2006.

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部