期刊文献+

激活性别刻板印象对源检测判断的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Gender Stereotypes Activation on Source-monitoring Decisions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨性别刻板印象的激活对源监测判断的效应。方法:采用三因素的混合实验设计。结果:刻板印象激活阶段的主效应显著;行为句子类型和来源变量之间的交互作用显著;三个因素之间的交互作用显著。结论:在学习后激活性别刻板印象,刻板印象会对源记忆产生影响,导致刻板一致偏向的猜测;学习前激活性别刻板印象,源记忆不会受到刻板印象的影响,提高了源记忆效果。 Objective: To determine whether gender stereotypes activation influence source-monitoring decision processes.Methods: The design was a 3 mixed factorial.Results: The main effect of instructional condition was significant;the two-way interaction between item type and source was statistically significan;and the three-way interaction was statistically significant.Conclusion: The Conclusion discover that the gender stereotypes provided after learning and before the test result in biased guessing in favour of the gender stereotypes,and that providing the gender stereotypes before learning improve source memory dramatically,thereby eliminating the guessing bias during the source test.
作者 佐斌 刘峰
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第3期284-286,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(05JAXLX009)和教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-06-0675)资助
关键词 性别刻板印象 源记忆 条件化源分数 Gender stereotypes Source memory Conditionalized source scores
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114(1): 3-28.
  • 2Johnson MK, Raye CL. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 1981, 88(1): 67-85.
  • 3Bayen U J, Nakamura GV, Dupuis SE, Yang CL. The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory and Cognition, 2000, 28(3): 480-500.
  • 4Marsh RL, Cook GI, Hicks JL. Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions. Memory, 2006, 14(2): 148-160.
  • 5Sherman JW, Bessenoff GR. Stereotypes as source monitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory. Psychological Science, 1999, 10(2): 106-110.
  • 6Cook GI, Marsh RL, Hicks JL. Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition, 2003, 12(2): 257- 278.
  • 7温芳芳,佐斌.熟悉性对刻板印象的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(5):489-491. 被引量:8
  • 8Brewer WF, Treyens JC. Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 1981, 13:207-230.
  • 9Snodgrass JG, Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1958, 117(1): 34-50.
  • 10Bayen U J, Murnane K, Erdfelder E. Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(1): 197-215.

二级参考文献24

  • 1胡志海.大学生职业性别刻板印象的内隐研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1122-1125. 被引量:50
  • 2佐斌,刘晅.基于IAT和SEB的内隐性别刻板印象研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(4):57-63. 被引量:39
  • 3Fiske ST. Social Beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. John Wiley and Sons, 2004. 398-400
  • 4Macrae CN, Mitchell JP, Pendry LF. What's in a forename? Cue familiarity and stereotypical thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002, 38:186-193
  • 5Smith ER, Miller DA, Maitner AT, et al. Familiarity can increase stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 42:471-478
  • 6Bornstein RF, D'Agostino PR. The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attribution model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 1994, 12:103-128
  • 7Garcia MT, Mackie DM. The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 2001, 19 (1):9-34
  • 8Reder LM, Ritter FE. What determines initial feehngs of knowing. Familiarity with question terms not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1992, 18:435-451
  • 9Jacoby LL, Kelley CM, Brown J, et al. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56:326-338
  • 10Yzerbyt VY, Dardenne B, Leyens JP. Social judge ability concerns in impression formation. In Yzerbyt VY, Lories G. Meta cognition: Cognitive and social dimensions, 1998. 126-156

共引文献7

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部