摘要
萨义德"旅行理论"通过分析卢卡奇"物化——总体性"理论在批评家戈德曼、威廉斯理论中的旅行过程,指出理论接受者自身所处的"情境"和"批判意识"对理论接受分别产生的不同作用。但是他只考虑理论的接受者,忽视了理论创造者理论中存在的永恒价值问题,因而得出"变化的存在的就是进步的和合理的","批判意识能弥补理论未能涵盖的现实"这两个命题。本文以阶级认同意识方法,补充萨义德"旅行理论"的某些片面之处,指出阶级认同意识在理论旅行中具有决定性作用。
By analyzing Lukacs' "reification-and-totality" theory,which travels from Goldmann to William,Said's traveling theory points out that the recipients of theory,who live in the particular situation and have critical senses,play important roles for the acceptance of theory.However,he only considers the recipient of the theory while ignores the eternal value of the theory creator,so he draws a conclusion that variety is progressive and rational,and critical senses can cover up the theory,which can not include all realities.This paper agrees on the research method of consciousness of class identity,tries to make up some shortcoming of Said's traveling theory and hold that consciousness of class identity plays a decisive role in traveling theory.
出处
《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2010年第3期112-115,共4页
Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
情境
批判意识
阶级认同意识
traveling theory
situation
critical senses
consciousness of class identity