期刊文献+

可转换债券对并购双边道德风险防范的实验研究 被引量:4

Experimental Investigation on Influence of Convertible Bonds on Resoultion of Double Moral Hazard in Mergers and Acquisitions
原文传递
导出
摘要 以往对可转换债券与双边道德风险防范的研究仅限于风险资本投资过程中,较少有研究对其在并购中作为支付契约所发挥的作用进行分析。通过借鉴经济学实验室方法,研究在私有利益存在的情况下,可转换债券支付契约对于防范并购中双边道德风险所发挥的作用。实验设计依据双边道德风险模型中公认的参数表示方法,用并购双方所投入的努力水平测度道德风险,以现金支付契约、股票支付契约和现金加股票的混合支付契约作为控制组,以可转换债券支付契约作为观察组。研究结果表明,可转换债券和股票对目标方的激励效果显著优于现金,可转换债券对并购方的激励效果显著优于其他契约,可转换债券契约的并购协同效应显著高于其他契约,且随着并购方投入水平的增加,目标方执行转换期权的可能性越大。 Privious researches on convertible bonds and the prevention of double moral hazard mainly focuse on venture capital investment,few attention has been paid to its function as payment contract in mergers and acquisitions(MAs).By introducing an experimental appraoch,this paper studies how convertible bonds payment contract prevents double moral hazard in MAs under the consideration of private benefits.On the basis of a well-accepted parametric representated method in double moral hazard model,the effort levels of partners in MAs were used to measure double moral hazard in this experiment design.Furthermore,cash,stock,a mixed of cash and stock contracts were regarded as control groups,and convertible bonds contract was regarded as observation groups.The results demonstrate that,firstly the incentive effects in convertible bonds and stock on targets are significantly better than that in cash,secondly the incentive effect of convertible bonds on acquirers is better than that in cash and stock,thirdly the synertic value of convertible bonds is obviously higher than others,and the higher the effort levels of acquirers,the stronger the conversion option probablitily of targets.
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期32-40,共9页 Journal of Management Science
基金 西安交通大学"985"工程二期项目(07200701)~~
关键词 可转换债券 并购 金融契约 私有利益 convertible bonds mergers and acquisitions finance contract private benefits
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Slovin M B, Sushka M E, Polonchek J A. Methods of Payment in Asset Sales:Contracting with Equity versus Cash [ J ] . Journal of Finance, 2005,60 (5) :2385 -2407.
  • 2姚琼.股权结构的治理效应研究——来自资本结构的经验证据[J].经济管理,2004,30(18):34-39. 被引量:4
  • 3Cornu P, Isakov D. The Deterring Role of the Medium of Payment in Takeover Contests : Theory and Evidence from the UK [ J ]. European Financial Management, 2000,6(4) :423-440.
  • 4Brusco S, Lopomo G, Viswanathan S. Efficient Mechanisms for Mergers and Acquisitions [ J ]. International Economic Review, 2007,48 (3) :995-1035.
  • 5Moeller S B, Schlingemann F P, Stulz R. Firm Size and the Gains from Acquisitions [ J ] . Journal of Financial Economics, 2004,73 (2) : 201 - 228.
  • 6Dong M, Hirshleifer D, Richardson S A, Teoh S H. Does Investor Misvaluation Drive the Takeover Market ? [ J ] . Journal of Finance, 2006,61 (2) : 725- 762.
  • 7Dube S, Francis-Gladney L, Romero R, Langdon W. Merger Motives for U. S. Utility Acquirers [ J ] . Journal of Business and Economics Research, 2007,5 (5) :49-62.
  • 8Finnerty J D, Yan A. Convertible Securities in Merger Transactions and the Resolution of the Double-sided Asymmetric Information Problem [ C ]//EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings, 2006.
  • 9Hansen R G. A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions [ J ]. Journal of Business, 1987,60( 1 ) :75-95.
  • 10Dyck A, Zingales L. Control Premiums and the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance Systems [ J ]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2005,16 ( 2-3 ) : 51-72.

二级参考文献41

  • 1黄少安,张岗.中国上市公司股权融资偏好分析[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):12-20. 被引量:971
  • 2Brailsford。J.T.,B.R.Oliver and S.L.H.Pua.,Theory and Evidence 012 the Relationship Between Ownership Structure and Capital Structure,SSRN working paper,1999.
  • 3Maksimovic, V. and J. Zechner., Debt, Agency Costs, and Industry Equilibrium, The Journal of Finance, 1991,46(5): 1619-1643.
  • 4McConnell, J. and H. Servaes., Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, 27(2): 595-612.
  • 5McConnell, J. and H. Servaes., Equity Ownership and the Two Faces of Debt, Journal of Financial Economics,1995, 391 131-157.
  • 6Miguel, A. and J. Pindado., Determinants of Capital Structure.. New Evidence From Spanish Panel Data, Journal of Corporate Finance, 2001, 7: 77-99.
  • 7Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vistmy., Managerial Ownership and Market Valuation, Journal of FinancialEconomics, 1988, 20(1/2): 293-315.
  • 8Rajan, R.G., and L. Zingales, What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International data. The Journal of Finance, 1995, 50 (5): 1421-4160.
  • 9Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2): 737-783.
  • 10Titman, S. and R. Wessels, The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice, The Journal of Finance, 1988, XLⅢ:1-19.

共引文献57

同被引文献80

  • 1柳桂芳.市场经济条件下企业并购问题的探讨[J].商情,2008(2):13-13. 被引量:1
  • 2吴联生,白云霞.公司价值、资产收购与控制权转移方式[J].管理世界,2004,20(9):123-130. 被引量:175
  • 3孙芳伟.中外企业并购支付方式的比较研究[J].现代管理科学,2007(3):41-42. 被引量:4
  • 4李善民,周小春.公司特征、行业特征和并购战略类型的实证研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(3):130-137. 被引量:145
  • 5Myers S C, Majluf N S. Corporate financing and invest- ment decisions when firms have information that inves- tors do not have [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13: 187-221.
  • 6Hansen R G. A theory for the choice of exchange medi- um in the market for corporate control [J]. Journal of Business, 1987, 60: 75-95.
  • 7Fishman M J. Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions [J]. Journal of Fi- nance, 1989, 44: 41-57.
  • 8Eckbo B E, Giammarino R M, Heinkel R L. Asymmet- ric information and the medium of exchange in take- overs : theory and tests[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1990, 3: 651-675.
  • 9Berkovitch E, Narayanan M. Competiiion and the medi- um of exchange in takeovers [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1990, 3(2): 153-174.
  • 10Ross S. The determination of financial structure: the in- centive signalling approach [J]. Bell Journal of Econom- ics, 1977, 8: 23-40.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部