期刊文献+

CA19-9联合多层螺旋CT在胰腺癌可切除性评估中的价值 被引量:3

CA19-9 Combined with Multi-slice Spiral CT Assessing Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨CA19-9联合多层螺旋CT在胰腺癌可切除性评估中的价值。方法:将85例胰腺癌患者,根据治疗方式分为根治切除组、姑息手术治疗组与非手术治疗组,分析多层螺旋CT、CA19-9及二者联合在评估胰腺癌可切除性中的作用。结果:以CA19-9大于200作为评估不可切除的临界值,CA19-9评估胰腺癌可切除的准确率为65.6%,不可切除的准确率为56.6%。非手术治疗组CA19-9水平与根治切除组、姑息手术治疗组比较存在显著差异(P<0.05)。多层螺旋CT对判断胰腺癌可切除的准确率为71.4%,不可切除的准确率为77.4%。二者联合对胰腺癌可切除性评估的准确率为78.6﹪,不可切除的准确率为95.7﹪。结论:CA19-9联合多层螺旋CT可以更好的评估胰腺癌的可切除性。 Objective To investigate the value of CA19-9 combined with multi-slice spiral CT in assessing the resectability of pancreatric cancer. Methods Eighty-five patients diagnosed as pancreatic cancer were divided into radical resection group, palliative surgical treatment group, and non-surgical treatment group. The value of CT and CA19-9 or their combined use in assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer were analyzed. CA19-9 level of 200 U/mL was used as a threshold to determine unresectability. Results The accuracy of CA19-9 for the prediction of respectability was 65.6%, that for the prediction of unresectability was 56.6%. Compared with the radical resection group and the palliative surgical treatment group, the levels of CA19-9 in non-surgical treatment group were significantly different. The accuracy of multi-slice spiral CT for the prediction of respectability was 71.4%, that for the prediction of unresectability was 77.%. The accuracy of CA19-9 combined with the multi-slice spiral CT in judging the resectability of pancreatic cancer was 78.65%, and for prediction of unresectability was 95.7%. Conclusion CA19-9 combined with multi-slice spiral CT has a greater value in the assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer.
出处 《中国中西医结合外科杂志》 CAS 2010年第3期287-291,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 胰腺癌 CA19-9 多层螺旋CT 可切除性 pancreatic cancer CA19-9 multi-slice spiral CT respectability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1Liao, Quan,Zhao, Yu-Pei,Yang, Ying-Chi,Li, Li-Jun,Long, Xiao,Han, Shao-Mei.Combined detection of serum tumor markers for differential diagnosis of solid lesions located at the pancreatic head[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2007,6(6):641-645. 被引量:27
  • 2吴晰,陆星华,徐彤,钱家鸣,赵平,郭晓钟,杨晓鸥,蒋卫君.肿瘤标志物、K-ras和p53突变对胰腺癌诊断的价值[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(10):741-744. 被引量:4
  • 3Del Villano B C, Brennan S, Brock P et al. Radioimmunometric assay for a monoclonal-defined tumor marker, CA19-9. Clin Chem, 1982,29:549.
  • 4Schlieman M G, Ho H S, Bold R J. Utility of tumor markers in determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg, 2003,138:951.
  • 5Freeny P C. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Oncol, 1999,10:182.
  • 6Elferink R P. Understanding and controlling hepatobiliary function. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2002,16:1025.
  • 7Mann D V, Edwards R, Ho S et al. CA19-9: Clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eun J Oncol, 2000,26:474.
  • 8Mery C M, Duarte-Rojo A, Paz-Pineda F et al. Does cholestasis change the clinical usefulness of CA19-9 in pancreatobiliary cancer? Rev Invest Clin, 2001,53:511.
  • 9Hawes RH, Xiong Q, Waxman I, et al. A multispecialty approach to the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol, 2000,95:17-31.
  • 10Lu DSK, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR, 1997,168:1439-1443.

共引文献44

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部