期刊文献+

“永恒的罗马”:观念的变化与调整 被引量:1

"永恒的罗马":观念的变化与调整
下载PDF
导出
摘要 古代世界各文明转型时期的历史是史学界关注的重要问题。本专题从不同的角度对古希腊、罗马等若干转型时期的历史现象进行讨论,以进一步深化对历史发展规律和特点的认识。王大庆分析了希腊城邦向帝国时代转型面临的困境与趋势,指出陷入危机的希腊城邦并不具备像共和末期的罗马那样建立帝国的条件和动力。杨共乐分析了经济因素在罗马由共和政体向元首政体转变过程中的作用,指出政体的变革与经济发展之间的密切关系。刘林海分析了罗马帝国后期的"永恒的罗马"的观念,指出虽然"永恒的罗马"的观念并没有随着罗马的衰亡而消失,甚至有所强化,但其具体表现形式却随着现实的变化而有所调整。这种调整是与罗马历史传统的封闭性和开放性特点相一致的。 This paper discusses some turns of civilization of ancientGreece and Rome in differ-ent angles so as to have a further understanding of rules and characteristics of historical development.Wang Da-qing thinks thatthe city-states of ancientGreece in crisis had no conditions and dynamics forestablishing an empire like Rome at the end of republic. Yang Le-gong analyzes the role of economicfactor in the period fromrepublic to monarch in Rome. Liu Lin-hai analyzes the idea of 'eternal Rome' in the late Rome and points out that this idea does not disappear with the end of Rome.
作者 刘林海
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期70-73,共4页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 罗马帝国 调整 内忧外患 日耳曼 蛮族 罗马人 境内 政治 the turn of civilization city-states of ancient Greece Rome 'eternal Rome'
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kenneth J. Pratt, Rome as Eternal, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1965), p. 26.
  • 2The Elegies of Tibullus, Theodore C.Williams tran. ,The Gorham Press, Boston 1905, Ⅱ. 5,23.
  • 3Livy, History of Rome, B. O. Foster, tran. , vol. Ⅱ, vol. Ⅲ, vol.Ⅴ, vol. Ⅷ, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1922,1923, 1929, 1949,iv. 4,4; v. 7,10; xxii. 16,12; xxviii. 28,11.
  • 4Virgil, Aeneid, H. Rushton Fairclough, tran. , vol. I, Loeb Classcial Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1938, 1.282.
  • 5Martin Percival Charlesworth, Providentia and Aeternitas, The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Apr. , 1936).
  • 6F. G. Moore, On Urbs Aeterna and Urbs Sacra, Transactions of the American Philological Association, Vol. 25 (1894).
  • 7F. G. Moore, On Urbs Aeterna and Urbs Sacra.
  • 8Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History, vol. I, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1935, ⅩⅣ. 6, 3; ⅩⅤ. 7,10.
  • 9Theodore S. De Bruyn, Ambivalence Within a "Totalizing Discourse" :Augustine's Sermons on the Sack of Rome, Journal of Early Christian Studies, vol. 1:4 (1993).
  • 10The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions, Clyde Pharr, tran., The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., New Jersey, 2001.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部