摘要
刑事诉讼中被告人以陷阱侦查作为其出罪的抗辩理由之一,此抗辩即为陷阱抗辩。出于对控辩双方证明能力和证明手段对比之考量,陷阱抗辩的证明责任分为客观合法性证明和主观倾向性证明两个层面,分别由控辩双方承担。这种独特的证明责任构成是诱惑侦查案件中重要的分配正义的方式之一。
The accused in criminal proceedings will use trap detecting as a defense of the crime and this defense is known as trap defense.Out of the unbalanced comparison of proven ability and proven methods between the prosecution and the accused,the burden of proof in trap defense should be divided into two levels: objective legitimacy and subjective bias.The above two levels should be undertaken by the prosecution and the accused respectively.This unique constitution of burden of proof is one of the important ways of distributing justice in enticement investigating cases.
出处
《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第2期69-72,共4页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
关键词
陷阱抗辩
客观合法性
主观倾向性
trap defense
objective legitimacy
subjective bias