期刊文献+

昼间自由行驶状态下驾驶员空间距离判识规律 被引量:2

Space Distance Cognition Laws of Drivers in Free Driving in Day
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将判识特征值在设计速度和距离按泰勒公式展开,依据判识距离化趋势,用二元三次函数逼近,建立了空间绝对距离、相对距离判识变化数学模型.结果表明:绝对距离判识值随障碍物深度距离增加而增大,随速度增加减小.相对距离判识受深度距离影响小,速度变化影响大,二元二次函数可很好逼近空间距离判识变化规律. The paper Disposed these data according to Taylor formula and simulated variation trend with binary cubic function and found cognition mathematics models of absolute and relative distances in day.Test results show that cognitive absolute distances augment with depth distance increasing and decrease with speed increasing.Depth distance has a little impact on relative ones and velocity has a lot impact.Binary quadratic equation can simulate cognition variation laws.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)》 2010年第3期492-495,共4页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(批准号:50778023)
关键词 驾驶员 自由行驶 深度距离 速度 判识距离 函数逼近 drivers free driving depth distance velocity distance cognition function simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

共引文献48

同被引文献23

  • 1邓明阳,付锐,陈广交.道路交通事故背景因素指标的采集和统计分析[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(4):852-856. 被引量:4
  • 2赵炜华,王丽华,叶飞,刘浩学.驾驶人所处环境照度对视认距离影响[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(6):11-16. 被引量:13
  • 3郑安文,苑红伟,等.道路交通安全概论[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2010,1.
  • 4Crundall D, Shenton C, Underwood G. Eye Movements During Intentional Car Following [ J ]. Perception, 2004,33 (8) :975 -986.
  • 5Del Castillo JM, Benitez FG. On the Functional form of the Speed - Density Relationship Part Two: Empirical Investigation[J]. Transportation Research B, 1995,29 (5) :391 -406.
  • 6S Plainis, IJ Murray. Reaction Times as An Index of Visual Conspicuity When Driving at Night [ J ]. Oph-thai. Physiol. Opt ,2002,22 (4) :409 - 415.
  • 7Marsden G, Brackstone M, Mcdonald M, et al. A comparison of differing driving populations using the ICC FOT classifi- cation scheme[C]. Proceedings of 82"d Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2003: 12-16.
  • 8Piao J, Mcdonald M. Low speed car following behaviour from floating vehicle data[C].Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Intelli- gent Vehicles Symposium, 2003:462 - 467.
  • 9Kim Taehyung. Analysis of variability in car-following behavior over long-term driving maneuvers[ D]. Maryland : Univer- sity of Maryland, 2005.
  • 10Taieb-maimon M, Shinar D. Minimum and comfortable driving headways: Reality versus perception [J]. Human Factors, 2001, 43 ( 1 ) : 159 - 172.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部