期刊文献+

药品专利保护的博弈分析——兼论“公地悲剧”与“反公地悲剧”研究现状 被引量:2

Game analysis of patent protection of pharmaceutical products:a review of researches on tragedy of the commons and tragedy of the anticommons
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加强药品专利保护才能避免"公地悲剧"、促进医药产业的发展,但目前医药产业"专利丛林"现象,极易造成专利成果利用不足和上游基础研究被闲置的"反公地悲剧",为此学界在理论研究和实证分析中形成了"药品专利消极主义"和"药品专利积极主义"两种不同观点,笔者通过深入剖析指出,"药品专利消极主义"更具有可信度。 To strengthen patent protection of pharmaceutical products can avoid the tragedy of the commons and promote the development of pharmaceutical industry;however,patent thicket in pharmaceutical industry tend to result in the tragedy of the anticommons,that is,the underuse of the patent innovation and the impossibility of using upstream basic research.There are two different views formed in the process of theoretical and empirical analysis on the two tragedies,namely pro-drug patent and anti-drug patent.This article suggests that anti-drug patent is more credible.
作者 姚颉靖 彭辉
出处 《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第3期65-69,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
基金 上海市社科规划青年课题项目(编号:2006EZH002) 国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(编号:2007102344)
关键词 药品专利保护 公地悲剧 反公地悲剧 patent protection of pharmaceutical product tragedy of the commons tragedy of the anticommons
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Mansfield E,Schwarz M,Wagner S. Imitation costs and Patents:an empirical study[J]. Economic Journal, 1981 (91) : 907-918.
  • 2Mansfield E. Patent and innovation: an empirical study[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32 (2):173- 181.
  • 3Cohen W M, Nelson R R,Walsh J P. Protecting their intellectual assets:appropriability condition and why U. S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)[C]//Conference on New Science and Technology Indicators for the Knowledge-based Economy. OECD, 1996.
  • 4Levin R C,Klevorick A K. Appropriate the returns from industrial research and development: Brookings papers on economic activity[J]. Special Issue on Microeconomics, 1987 ( 3 ) : 783-831.
  • 5Talyor C T,Silberston Z A. The economics impact of the patent system: a study of the British experience[M]. Britain: Cambridge University Press. 1973.
  • 6Schankerman M. How valuable patent protection? Estimated by technology field[J].RAND Journal of Economics, 1998,29(1) :77-107.
  • 7Taggart J H. Determinants of the foreign R&D locational decision in the pharmaceutical industry[J]. R&D Management,2007,21 (3) : 229-240.
  • 8Harvey E,Bale J. Patent protection and pharmaceutical innovation[J]. Now York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 1996, (29) : 95- 102.
  • 9Seherer F M. Sandy Weisburst. Economic effects of strengthening pharmaceutical patent protection in Italy[J].International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law,1995(6) : 1 009-1 024.
  • 10Pazderka B. Patent protection and pharmaceutical R&D spending in Canada[J].Canadian Public Policy,1999,25(1) :29-46.

二级参考文献12

共引文献13

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部