期刊文献+

中美大学课程考核方法之比较分析 被引量:33

A Comparative Study of Methods for Course Assessment Used by Chinese and American Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文比较了中美两国大学课程考核方法,研究了它们与各自人才培养质量标准的相关性,以期用国际化的教考方法和人才培养质量标准,推动中国大学课程考核方法的变革和人才培养目标的真正实现。 This paper presents a comparative study of the methods for course assessment used by Chinese and American universities and their correlations to specific quality standards.Advanced overseas assessment methods and quality standards should be incorporated into China's reform in university course assessment to help accomplish the goals of education.
作者 陈棣沭 韩婧
出处 《教育与现代化》 CSSCI 2010年第2期91-96,共6页 Education and Modernization
关键词 中美大学比较 课程考核 comparison of Chinese and American universities course assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1韩锋.美国评价学生的七项标准[N].中国科技报,2001-02-21.
  • 2http://biog.cctr.net.cn/user1/wxdq66/archives/2007/6308.html.
  • 3http://222.240.251.116:888/study/sys8/linecourse.asp?id=2007062713343188204.
  • 4Grading Policy[EB/OL].http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/syllabus.html.2009-4-15.
  • 5Prof.Richard Pogge.How Ⅰ Compute Your Course Grade:A Worked Example[EB/OL].http://www.astronomy.ohiostate.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Quizzes/grade.html.2009-4-20.
  • 6Prof.Richard Pogge.In-Class Quizzes,Study Guides & Results[EB/OL].http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Quizzes/index.html.2009-4-25.
  • 7Prof.Richard Pogge.Homework Assignments[EB/OL].http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Homework.2009-4-15.
  • 8Prof.Richard Pogge.The Final Examination[EB/OL].http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/pogge/Ast161/final.html.2009-4-25.
  • 9刘寿堂.大学公共课程平时成绩考评手段质疑及商榷[J].黑龙江高教研究,2009,27(2):174-176. 被引量:26

二级参考文献3

共引文献32

同被引文献190

引证文献33

二级引证文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部