4Cunningham, D J. (1992) Assessing Constructions and Constructing Assessments: ADialogue. In. T M Duffy &D H Jonassen(Eds. ), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (pp. 35 -44), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5Driver, R( 1995 ). Constructivist Approaches to Science Teaching. InL P Steffe and J Gale( Eds), constroctivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawence Edbaum. pp. 385-400.
6Solomon, J . Social influenceson the construction of pupils' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education. 1987,14, 63 - 82.
7Collette,A T , & Chiappetta, E C. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and science school (3nd, pp. 27 -47 ). Columbas U. S. A. : Merrill.
8Duit R. The constructivst view in science education - what it has to offer and what should not be expected from it [EB/OL].http: //www. if. ufrgs. br/public/ensino/N1/3artigo. htm,2001 - 07 - 18/2002 - 12 - 15.
9Driver, R. (1989). Changing conceptions. In P A , Ed , Adoleseent development and school science[ M ]. (pp. 77 - 79 ).London: Falmer Press.
10Sarvery, J R &Duffy, T M. (1995). Problem - based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, Sep./Oct. 31- 38.
