摘要
目的对石楠藤、爬山虎、络石藤进行比较鉴别。方法通过对药材原植物的鉴别、横切面的性状鉴别、粉末显微鉴别三个方面来鉴别石楠藤、爬山虎、络石藤。结果石楠藤、爬山虎、络石藤三者在原植物、性状、显微三个方面均存在较大差异。结论石楠藤与其混淆品爬山虎、络石藤在临床使用中不能混淆。
OBJECTIVE To Piper wallichii(Miq.) Hand-Mazz var,Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Sieb.Et Zucc.) Planch.,compared Trachelospermum jasminoides(Lind1.)Lem identification.METHODS The ingredients of plants,traits,microscopic three areas to identify Piper wallichii(Miq.) Hand-Mazz var,Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Sieb.Et Zucc.) Planch,Trachelospermum jasminoides(Lind1.)Lem.RESULTS In the original Piper wallichii(Miq.) Hand-Mazz var,Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Sieb.Et Zucc.) Planch.,compared Trachelospermum jasminoides(Lind1.)Lem plants,traits,microscopic three areas there are greater differences.CONCLUSION Piper wallichii(Miq.) Hand-Mazz var goods Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Sieb.Et Zucc.) Planch.its confusion,Tongxinluo stone on the vine in the deployment of confusion can not be used.
出处
《海峡药学》
2010年第6期96-98,共3页
Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词
石楠藤
爬山虎
络石藤
比较鉴别
Piper wallichii(Miq.) Hand-Mazz var
Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Sieb.Et Zucc.) Planch.
Tongxinluo-vine
To compare the differential