期刊文献+

字本位和逻各斯中心主义两种证据观及其历史演变 被引量:1

Study on Character-Centered Discourse and "De-Sinogrammalization" Discourse and Tri-fold Evidence Methodology
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文重点讨论了两种证据观:字本位的证据观和逻各斯中心主义的证据观。并进一步认为,中国传统证据观是字本位性的,表现在言、文、象三重证据符号的关系中以"书写"或经典为中心。现代中国发生了证据观的革命性变化,主要表现为"去汉字化"的逻各斯中心主义证据观,即在言、文、象三重证据符号的关系中以"言、象"为中心。"去汉字化"建立了中国现代性证据观,同时也难以避免地导致了与传统文化的断裂。 In this article, discourse is interpreted both as a way to represent the world and as a symbol field, taking into account all three sign terms -- speech, graph and image. It is argued that traditional Chinese discourse is Character-centered, with reference to written materials, especially the "writing character" as the core of the relationship of speech, graph and images. The movement of discourse in modern China took de-sinogramalization as its feature, i.e. it emphasized "speech and image" in the relationship of speech, graph and image, while "lexeme and object" in the relationship of writing words, lexemes and objects. De-Sinogrammalization urged the establishment of a modem Chinese discourse, resulting in a break with traditional character-centered discourse and the culture discontinuity.
作者 孟华
出处 《证据科学》 2010年第3期329-338,共10页 Evidence Science
基金 证据科学教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学)开放基金项目"三重证据法的符号学研究"(批准号:08KFKT003)
关键词 证据观 三重证据法 字本位 Discourse, Character-centered, De-sinogramalization, Re-sinogrammalization, Tri-fold Evidence Methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献4

共引文献139

同被引文献18

  • 1苏珊·哈克.《证据与探究-走向认识论的重构》,陈波等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004年,第1页.
  • 2Colapietro, V, Glossary of Semiotics, New York: Paragon House, 1993, p. 179.
  • 3James Allen, Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001 , p. 1.
  • 4Simon Schama, Dead Certainties: (Unwarranted Speculations) , New York: Vintage Books, 1992, p. 320.
  • 5Ian Hacking, The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophy Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference, London: Cambridge University Press, 1978, p. 37.
  • 6Nicholas Rescher, A Theory of Evidence, Philosophy of Science, Wol. 25, No. 1, 1958, pp. 83 -94.
  • 7http://www, websters - online - dictionary, org/definition/evidence.
  • 8Goodman, S.N. & R. Royall, Evidence and Scientific Research, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, 1988, pp. 1568 - 1574.
  • 9Frank K. Lester, Jr. & Dylan William, The Evidential Basis for Knowledge Claims in Mathematics, Education Research Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2000, pp. 132 - 137.
  • 10Rudolf Carnap, An Introduction to The Philosophy of Science, New York: Gardner, M. Basic Books, 1966, p. 51.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部