5C. Tigre and G. Rafainer, Wireline Replacement in Pilot Wells by LWD Tools Including Formation Testers, SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20-23 June 2005.
6Greg Schlachter, Using Wireline Formation Evaluation Tools To Characterize Coalbed Methane Formations, 2007 SPE East Kentucky Symposium held in Lexington, Kentucky, U. S. A. , 18-21 October 2007.
7J.C. Mayes, SPE, B. E. Boling, D. M. Mootoo, and Meghan O'Keefe, SPE, Schlumberger, and W.J. Gwilliam, U.S. DOE, A 200℃, 35,000--psi HP/HT MWD Tool: Development Program, Architecture, Mission Profile, and Prototype Testing Results to Date, 2007 SPE/ IADC Drilling Conference held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 20- 22 Fehruarv 2007.
8J. Strobel, M. Boehem, and M. Doehler, RWE Dea AG; M. Meister, A. Buysch, J. Pragt, and H. Schrader, Baker Hghes INTEQ. Comparison of Formation Pressure and Mobility Data Derived During Formation Testing While Drilling with a Mud Motor with Production Data and Core Analysis, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 23-25 February 2005.
5Desbrandes R, Bourgoyne A T JR, Carter J A, 《MWD Transmission Data Rates Can be Optimized》, Petroleum Engineer International,June 1987.
6J D Macpherson, P N Jogi and B E Vos,《Easurement of Mud Motor Rotation Rates using Drilling Dynamics》, the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference held in Arnsterdarn, The Netherlands, 27 February-1 March 2001.
7Tim J Bourgeois,et al.Pushing the Limits of Formation Evaluation While Drilling[J].Oil field Review,1998.