期刊文献+

ENBD预防胆管多发结石ERCP术后急性胰腺炎及高淀粉酶血症65例 被引量:58

Effi cacy of ENBD in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia in patients with common bile duct stones: an analysis of 65 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)预防胆总管多发结石患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)术后急性胰腺炎及高淀粉酶血症的价值.方法:收集我院胆总管多发结石患者141例(ENBD组65例,常规治疗组77例),比较两组并发症的发生和治疗的情况.结果:ENBD组和常规治疗组相比,术后2h及术后24h的血淀粉酶、术后高淀粉酶血症发生率及ERCP术后急性胰腺炎的发生率均有显著性差异(67.3U/L±9.1U/Lvs98.3U/L±11.2U/L,89.5U/L±13.0U/Lvs126.2U/L±14.2U/L,均P<0.01).结论:ENBD可以有效预防胆总管多发结石患者ERCP术后急性胰腺炎及高淀粉酶血症. AIM: To investigate the value of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) in the prevention of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia in patients with common bile duct stones. METHODS: The clinical data of 141 patients with common bile duct stones, including 65 undergoing ENBD and 77 undergoing routine treatment, were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy and complication rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Serum amylase levels at 2 and 24h postoperatively were significantly lower in the ENBD group than in the routine treatment group (67.3 U/L ± 9.1 U/L vs 98.3 U/L ± 11.2 U/L, 89.5 U/L ± 13.0 U/L vs 126.2 U/L ± 14.2 U/L, both P 0.01). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia was also signif icantly lower in the ENBD group than in the routine treatment group. CONCLUSION: ENBD can effectively prevent the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia in patients with common bile duct stones.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第16期1724-1727,共4页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 胆总管多发结石 内镜逆行胰胆管造影 内镜鼻胆管引流术 并发症 急性胰腺炎 高淀粉酶血症 Common bile duct stones Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage Complication Pancreatitis Hyperamylasemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Cotton PB,Lehman G,Vennes J,Geenen JE,ussell RC,Meyers WC,Liguory C,Nickl N.Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:an attempt at consensus.Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.
  • 2李兆申.中国ERCP研究现状[J].世界华人消化杂志,2000,8(4):446-448. 被引量:66
  • 3Loperfido S,Angelini G,Benedetti G,Chilovi F,Costan F,De Berardinis F,De Bernardin M,Ederle A,Fina P,Fratton A.Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP:a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
  • 4Tanner AR.ERCP:present practice in a single region.Suggested standards for monitoring performance.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;8:145-148.
  • 5Christensen M,Matzen P,Schulze S,Rosenberg J.Complications of ERCP:a prospective study.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:721-731.
  • 6Christoforidis E,Goulimaris I,Kanellos I,Tsalis K,Demetriades C,Betsis D.Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia:patient-related and operative risk factors.Endoscopy 2002;34:286-292.
  • 7Cheng CL,Sherman S,Watkins JL,Barnett J,Freeman M,Geenen J,Ryan M,Parker H,Frakes JT,Fogel EL,Silverman WB,Dua KS,Aliperti G,Yakshe P,Uzer M,Jones W,Goff J,Lazzell-Pannell L,Rashdan A,Temkit M,Lehman GA.Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis:a prospective multicenter study.Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:139-147.
  • 8Masci E,Mariani A,Curioni S,Testoni PA.Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:a metaanalysis.Endoscopy 2003;35:830-834.
  • 9Murray WR.Reducing the incidence and severity of post ERCP pancreatitis.Scand J Surg 2005;94:112-116.
  • 10Testoni PA.Preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis:where are we? JOP 2003;4:22-32.

二级参考文献59

共引文献352

同被引文献423

引证文献58

二级引证文献395

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部