期刊文献+

我国死刑案件“发回”、“移送”、“改判”多重选择机制的构建 被引量:4

Establish the multiple choice system of the back, transfer, commute about the death penalty case in our country
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据死刑复核实践中发回重审的理由,可以将发回重审分为"事实不清、证据不足型"、"诉讼程序违法型"、"适用法律错误型"、"量刑不当型"四种不同的类型。在死刑复核程序中,发回重审具有纠正错误、限制死刑的功能。我国目前的发回重审制度实行单一"发回"、垂直"发回"机制,制约了发回重审功能的正常发挥。本文主张,可以根据四种不同的类型,建立"发回"、"移送"、"改判"多重选择、多元处理的程序倒流机制。 According to the reasons for retrial in the practice of death penalty revision, retrial can be divided into four different types which named "Obscure facts and weak evidences", "Illegal procedure", "Misapplied laws", "Inappropriate sanction". In the procedures of death penalty revision, remand has the functions of correcting errors and limiting the death penalty. Under China’s current retrial system, the imple- mentation of the single "returned" and vertical "back"mechanism has restricted the normal functioning of the remand. This paper draws a proposition that, according to four different types, we can establish a mechanism which presents a "back", "transfer", "commute" multiple choice and multiple handling procedures.
作者 郇习顶
出处 《四川警察学院学报》 2010年第3期17-21,共5页 Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词 死刑案件 发回 移送 改判 Type Back Transfer Commute
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

共引文献9

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部