5Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
6Jonathan M, Flalkov SPH, Bernard F,et al. Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol,2000 ,164 :640-643.
7Eterovic D, Juretic KL, Capkun V, et al. Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol, 1999,161:39-44.
8Grenabo L,Lindqvist K, Adami HO, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. Treatment policy is as important for success as type of lithotriptor and patient selection. Arch Surg, 1997,132:20-26.
9Coptcoat MJ, Webb DR, Kellett MJ, et al. The complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Management and Prevention Brit J Urol,1986,58:578.
10Lingeman JE, Woods JR, Nelson DR. Commentary on ESWL and blood pressure. J Urol, 1995,154 (1):2.
