人群土源性线虫驱虫不同供药模式的可及性

The Accessibility for Anthelmintic Administration by Different Supply Patterns in Mass Deworming

采用问卷调查方法 ,对免费领药、免费送药和收费送药等3种不同供药模式获药、服药人数及未服药原因进行调查,对不同供药模式获药率、服药率进行分析比较。免费领药模式海南调查点的获药率和服药率分别为98.4%和94.1%,贵州省调查点分别为93.2%和90.9%。免费送药模式海南省调查点的获药率和服药率分别为97.5%和96.4%,湖南省调查点分别为98.8%和96.5%。收费送药模式贵州省调查点获药率和服药率分别为96.8%和95.6%,四川省调查点获药率和服药率分别为94.4%和91.5%。3种模式未服药原因主要有忘记服药、药物丢失或损坏、身体不适暂未服等。在有组织的人群驱虫工作中,3种模式均可获得较满意的效果,各地可因地制宜予以选择。

Questionnairing was performed in selected fields. Data were collected including the number of people who were getting/taking medicines, reasons for not getting/taking medicines, and a comparison was made on the rates of getting/taking drugs among three patterns of medicine supply. In the mode of drug-receiving at public expense, the rates of getting drugs and taking drugs were 98.4% and 94.1% respectively in Hainan province, 93.2% and 90.9% in Guizhou province. In the mode of drug-delivery at public expense, the rates of getting drugs and taking drugs were 97.5% and 96.4% in Hainan province, 98.8% and 96.5% in Hunan province. In the mode of drug-purchase at people′s own expense, the rates of getting drugs and taking drugs were 96.8% and 95.6% in Guizhou province, 94.4% and 91.5% in Sichuan province. The reasons for not taking drugs included forgetting, drug-losing or unwell condition. Three patterns of drug supply can get satisfactory results through careful arrangement. The government can choose an appropriate pattern suited to local conditions.