期刊文献+

儿童发育协调障碍评估工具在我国应用效度的初步分析 被引量:30

Validity of Movement Assessment Battery for children used in China.
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】对儿童发育协调障碍评估工具(Movement Assessment Battery for Children,M-ABC)在我国应用的第一阶段测试的效度进行初步分析,探讨其在中国学龄前儿童中的适用性。【方法】运用内容效度指数、Pearson相关分析、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析分别对M-ABC的内容效度、结构效度、效标相关效度进行分析。【结果】 M-ABC的平均内容效度指数为0.985,各测试项目与总障碍分之间的相关系数(r)在0.457~0.698之间。探索性因素分析共提取三个公因子(手灵巧度,目标/抓握能力,平衡能力),载荷在0.518~0.810之间;验证性因素分析的结构方程模型拟合效果较好,标准化回归系数在0.32~0.97之间;相关分析M-ABC各因子之间的r为0.326~0.416,各因子与运动障碍总分之间的Pearson相关系数为0.646~0.718。以发育性协调障碍问卷为外在效标,M-ABC与其总障碍分之间的r为0.514。【结论】 M-ABC各项效度指标均达到了运动心理测量学的要求,可以作为评价中国学龄前儿童发育性协调障碍的工具。 【Objective】 To preliminarily examine the validity of Movement Assessment Battery for Children(M-ABC) by using it in Chinese pre-school children and make a judgment of its utility. 【Method】 The content,construct and criterion-related validity were analyzed using Content Validity Index(CVI),Pearson correlation analysis,Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) respectively. 【Results】 The average CVI was 0.985.Correlation coefficient between each of items and total dysfunctional scores ranged from 0.457 to 0.698.Three common factors(Manual dexterity,aim/catching,balance) with EFA ranged from 0.518 to 0.810.The fitted result of CFA was 0.32~0.97.The correlation coefficients between each factors rranged from 0.326 to 0.416.The correlation coefficients between factors and total dysfunctional scores were from 0.326 to 0.416.The correlation coefficient between the total dysfunctional score of DCDQ(considered as criterion) and M-ABC was 0.514. 【Conclusions】 The validity of M-ABC can well meet motor-psychometric demands.M-ABC can be used as an instrument for screening developmental coordination disorder in pre-school Chinese children.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 2010年第7期556-559,共4页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金 欧盟第6框架基金资助项目(015396) 2009年度教育部创新团队项目资助(郝模主持)
关键词 发育性协调障碍评估工具 学龄前儿童 效度 Movement Assessment Battery for Children pre-school children validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [M]. 4th ed. Washington DC, 2000: 115-119.
  • 2Gillberg C. Deficits in attention ,motor control ,and perception :a brief review[M]. Arch Dis Child,2003,88(10) :904- 910.
  • 3Wouter C, Kristine DM, Christiane S, et al. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: a review of seven movement skill assessment tools[M]. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2008, 8 (6): 154-168.
  • 4Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2 examiner's manual[Z]. London: Harcourt Assessment,2007.
  • 5Polit DF, Beck CT. The Content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5),489-497.
  • 6孙晓军,周宗奎.探索性因子分析及其在应用中存在的主要问题[J].心理科学,2005,28(6):1440-1442. 被引量:91
  • 7李跃平,黄子杰.验证性因子分析在量表结构效度考核中作用[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(10):1198-1199. 被引量:63
  • 8Chow SM, Henderson SE. Interrater and test-retest Reliability of the movement assessment battery for Chinese preschool children [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2003,57(5):574-577.
  • 9徐永玟 成戎珠 游子莹等.台湾与美国学龄儿童于儿童动作测试组表现之比较.物理治疗,2004,29(5):307-316.
  • 10金华,柯晓燕,曾关惠,邹冰,杭跃跃,张宁.儿童发育性运动协调障碍问卷的信度和效度[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(9):852-853. 被引量:13

二级参考文献33

共引文献162

同被引文献310

引证文献30

二级引证文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部