期刊文献+

从对虚指词合并位置的调整简析最简方案亟待解决的问题 被引量:2

On the Adjustment of the Merging Position of Expletives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语虚指词(it和there)通常被认为没有指称性,但在句子的推导过程中却起着重要作用。本文通过分析Chomsky(2005a,b;2006)对虚指词合并位置的调整指出,虚指词在句法理论的构建中还存在特征赋值模式不统一、多重一致关系存在冗余等问题。但最简方案在2005年后对虚指词合并位置的调整的确使得其理论内部的探针/目标一致关系达到更高的一致性。本文通过含有两个CP结构的例句对此作了说明。 English expletives (it and there) play a crucial role in syntactic derivations, although they are usually considered to be non-referential. Chomsky(2O05a, b; 2006) put forward an adjustment of the merging position of expletives; an analysis of this adjustment reveals that further development of minimalist syntax is faced with overcoming the following inadequacies: diverging modes of feature valuation; redundancy in multiple agreement, etc. It is undeniable, however, that the adjustment of expletives'merging position achieves greater uniformity in probe/goal relations in Minimalist Syntax, which is vividly demonstrated through the derivation of a sentence consisting of two CPs.
作者 马志刚
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2010年第6期19-28,共10页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(08YK-01)的阶段性成果 广东省"211工程"三期建设项目<全球化背景下的外国语言文学研究>子课题<从句法-语用接口角度解读二语习得问题>(项目编号:GDUFS211-1-056)
关键词 虚指词 合并 成分统制 探针 目标 一致 expletives merge C-command probe goal agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Bowers, J. Transitivity [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2002 (33) : 183-224.
  • 2Belleti, A. The Case of Unaccusatives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1988 ( 19 ) : 1-34.
  • 3Costa, J. Postverbal Subjects and Agreement in Unaccusative Contexts in European Portuguese [J]. The Linguistic Review , 2001 ( 18 ): 1-17.
  • 4Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding[M]. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
  • 5Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge, MAMIT Press, 1995.
  • 6Chomsky, N. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework[A]. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 15 . ( Also published in R. Martin, D. Michaels and J Uriagereka ( eds ). Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honour of Howard Lasnik [C]. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1998 : 89-155 ).
  • 7Chomsky, N. Derivation by Phase [ A ]. In M. Kenstowicz ( ed ). Ken Hale. A Life in Language [C]. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1999 : 1-52.
  • 8Chomsky, N. Beyond Explanatory Adequacy [A]. Unpublished manuscript, MIT. ( A published version appeared in A. Belletti ( ed ). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures [C]. Oxford University Press, 2001:104-131 ).
  • 9Chomsky, N. Three Factors in Language Design [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005 ( 36 ) : 1-22.
  • 10Chomsky, N. On Phases [ A ] . Unpublished paper MIT (to appear in C. P. Otero et. al. (eds) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory [C]. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2005.

同被引文献37

  • 1唐玉柱.存现句中的there[J].现代外语,2001,24(1):23-33. 被引量:64
  • 2唐玉柱.存现动词的非宾格性假设[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2005,11(4):84-87. 被引量:29
  • 3潘海华,韩景泉.虚词there的句法地位及相关理论问题[J].当代语言学,2006,8(1):17-35. 被引量:37
  • 4Breivik, L. 1991. On the typological status of Old English [J]. Historical English Syntax 2: 31-50.
  • 5Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use [M]. New York: Praeger.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase [AJ. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language EC]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1-52.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部