摘要
尼采提出"基督教的爱理念"为最精巧的"怨恨之花"的断言,舍勒承接并驳斥该断言,提出现代仁爱才是真正的奴隶道德的起义。分析并比较两位哲人的怨恨论,他们对怨恨情感造成价值位移这一看法是一致的,该问题上的分歧在于对怨恨所颠覆的对象作出不同判断,这一分歧源于他们各自对于生命及生命价值的不同理解。
Friedrieh Nietzsche advanced that the love of Christianity is the resentment in the exquisite form. Max Scheler continued and refuted Friedrieh Nietzsche' assertion arguing that the contemporary benevolence is the true revolt of the slavish moral. By analysing and comparing the two philosophers' theory of resentment, we find they agree that resentment results in value shift while they differ in their judgement on the object overturn by resentment. The divergence of views derived from their different comprehension of life and life value.
出处
《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第6期19-23,共5页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
怨恨
尼采
舍勒
价值
resentment
Friedrieh Nietzsche
Max Scheler
value