期刊文献+

每搏量变异评价顽固性感染性休克患者容量反应性 被引量:23

Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价每搏量变异(SVV)能否作为机械通气的顽固性感染性休克患者容量反应性指标.方法 对收治于北京协和医院加强医疗科的42例顽固性感染性休克患者进行容量负荷试验,比较容量负荷试验有反应者和无反应者间SVV的差异,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定SVV判断容量反应性的阈值.结果 (1)42例患者中24例患者容量负荷试验有反应,18例患者无反应.(2)容量负荷试验前有反应者和无反应者间中心静脉压、心率、平均动脉压、全心舒张末容积指数差异无统计学意义,有反应者和无反应者间SVV差异有统计学意义(17.7±7.1比9.6±4.1,P=0.006).(3)以SVV≥12%评价顽固性感染性休克患者容量反应性,灵敏度为77%,特异度为85%.结论 SVV可作为顽固性感染性休克患者容量反应性指标. Objective To evaluate fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation (SVV) in mechanically ventilated patients with refractory septic shock.Methods Forty-two refractory septic shock patients were enrolled in the study.According to the responsiveness of fluid loading, the patients were divided into responsive group and non-responsive group.The SVV values of two groups were retrospectively analyzed.The receiver operating characteristic curve was drafted to determine the cut-off value of SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness.Results Among the 42 refractory septic shock patients, 24 were found responsive to fluid loading, 18 were not;before the fluid loading, central venous pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and global end-diastolic volume index in the both groups showed no significant differences whereas the SVV in the responsive group was much higher than that in the nonresponsive group (P =0.006).Using SVV ≥ 12% as the threshold to predict fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 77%,specificity was 85%.Conclusion SVV can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock patients.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期610-613,共4页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 每搏量变异 休克 脓毒性 容量反应性 Stroke volume variation Shock, septic Fluid responsiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Carlet JM,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008.Crit Care Med,2008,36:296-327.
  • 2Marik PE,Baram M.Non-invasive hemodynamic monitring in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Clin,2007,23:383-400.http://www.criticalcare.theclinics.com/article/S0749-0704 (07) 00031-0/abstract.
  • 3Michard F,Teboul JL.Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients:a critical analysis of the evidence.Chest,2002,121:2000-2008.
  • 4Marik PE,Baram M,Vahid B.Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness.? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.Chest,2008,134:172-178.
  • 5Muller L,Louart G,Bengler C,et al.The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure:a comparison with central venous pressure.Anesth Analg,2008,107:607-613.
  • 6Kim HK,Pinsky MR.Effect of tidal volume,sampling duration,and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation.Crit Care Med,2008,36:2858-2862.
  • 7Annane D,Bellissant E,Cavaillon JM.Septic shock.Lancet,2005,365:63-78.
  • 8Werdan K,Oelke A,Müller-Werdan U.Myocardial depression or septic cardiomyopathy//Vincent JL.Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medcine.Berlin:Spinger,2009:183-194.
  • 9Vincent JL,Weil MH.Fluid challenge revisited.Crit Care Med,2006,34:1333-1337.
  • 10De Backer D.Stroke volume vsriations.Minerva Anestesiol,2003,69:285 -288.

同被引文献219

引证文献23

二级引证文献212

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部