期刊文献+

企业代工动机、种类、强度与企业绩效的关系研究——基于深圳市制造业企业的研究

企业代工动机、种类、强度与企业绩效的关系研究——基于深圳市制造业企业的研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于业务外包过程中代工企业的研究,多侧重于分析其利弊和实际操作方法。对企业代工与企业绩效之间的关系的研究很鲜见。本文研究了企业代工动机、种类、强度与企业绩效之间的关系。实证分析结果表明:企业提高代工强度有损于盈利能力,但却可以提升企业的公司实力;企业参与研发,可以增强公司实力与盈利能力,但是不会帮助提升销售增长率;企业进行专用资产投资,对公司实力和销售增长率会有提高,但是会损害盈利能力。 Researches in view of outsourcing firms m ostly remain at the operation level,such as analysis of their advantages and disadvantages and the operating methods.What are the decisive factors of corporation performance? The results of the empirical study indicated:1)The motivation of positive outsourcing suppliers has nothing to do with the OEM/ODM intensity,while the motivation of passive outsourcing suppliers is negatively related to their OEM/ODM intensity.2) The motivation of outsourcing suppliers is positively related to invested in special assets and RD.3)The OEM/ODM intensity is found to be positively concerned with the capability of the firm and negatively concerned with the profitability of the firm.But it is not related to sales growth rate.4)The RD has nothing to do with the sales growth rate,while is positively concerned with thecapability and the profitability of the firm;invested in special assets is found to be positively concerned with the sales growth rate and the capability,while it is negatively related to the profitability of the firm.
作者 杨洋
出处 《特区经济》 北大核心 2010年第6期293-295,共3页 Special Zone Economy
关键词 代工强度 代工动机 代工种类 企业绩效 OEM/ODM Intensity OEM/ODM Motivation OEM/ODM Modes Corporate Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]Steele L W. Evaluating the Technical Operation.Research Management. 1988,31(5):11~18
  • 2[2]Ransley D L,Rogers J L.A Consensus on Best R&D Practices.Research Technology Management,1994,37(2):19~26
  • 3[3]Szakonji R.Measuring R&D Effectiveness.Research Technology Management,1994,37(2):27~32
  • 4[4]Christensen J F. Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy,1995,24(5):727~45
  • 5[5]Chiesa V.Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 1998,26(2):64~84
  • 6[6]Brockhoff K.Technology Management In the Company of the Future. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1996,8(2):175~189
  • 7[7]Pavitt K, Robson M, Townsend J. The Size Distribution of Innovation Firms In The UK: 1945-1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987, 35(3): 297~316
  • 8[8]Menke M M.Essentials of R&D Strategic Excellence. Research Technology Management, 1997,40(5):42~47
  • 9[9]Matheson J E, Menke M M. Using Decision Quality Principles To Balance Your R&D Portfolio. Research Technology Management, 1994,37(3): 38~43
  • 10[10]Yamin S, Gunasekaran A, Mavondo F T. Innovation Index and Its Implications on Organizational Performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 1999, 17(5): 495~503

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部