期刊文献+

无痛分娩中罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因的镇痛效果和安全性比较 被引量:3

Comparation of effects and safety of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in labor analgesia.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因分别联合芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的疗效和安全性。方法选取足月阴道分娩产妇170例,分为罗哌组(61例)、左旋组(55例)及未予镇痛的对照组(54例),观察并记录各组镇痛效果及对产程和母婴的影响。结果罗哌组、左旋组均取得良好镇痛效果(P<0.05);罗哌组第一产程(496.6±196.5)min,总产程时间(552.8±184.2)min;左旋组第一产程(503.1±201.7)min,总产程时间(569.3±182.0)min。两组均长于对照组(373.1±159.2)min、(429.0±126.4)min(P<0.05);产后出血量罗哌组(270.5±62.6)ml、左旋组(259.3±73.1)ml均高于对照组(228.8±55.0)(P<0.05)。结论罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因分别联合芬太尼用于分娩镇痛可取得良好的镇痛效果,但可延长产程时间及增加产后出血量,对新生儿结局无明显影响。 Objective To investigate the effect and safety of ropivacaine or levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl in labor analgesia. Methods A total of 170 women on vaginal delivery were randomly divided into the ropivacaine group ( n = 61 ) and lcvobupivacaine group (n = 55 ), and control group (n = 54 ) without labor analgesia. Analgesic effect on the mother and newborns was observed and recorded. Results Good analgesic effects were obtained in the two analgesic groups. The first and full labor process in the ropivacainc group (496.6±196.5 min,552.8 ± 184.2 rain, respectively) and lcvobupivacaine group(503.1 ± 201.7 min and tire 569.3± 182.0 min, respectively)was significantly longer than that in control group(373.1 ± 159.2 rain and 429.0 _± 126.4 min, respectively). The postpartum hemorrhage in the ropivacaine gourp ( 270.5 ± 62.6 nil ) and levobupivacaine group ( 259.3 ± 73.1 ml ) was significantly higher than that in control group (228.8 ~ 55.0) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine both have good effect on labor analgesia, and no adverse effect on newborns, but more attention should be paid to the delay of labor process and postpartum hemorrhage.
机构地区 武警 武警 武警
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2010年第4期293-295,共3页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
关键词 分娩镇痛 罗哌卡因 左旋布比卡因 labor analgesia ropivacaine levobupivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献34

  • 1何孔源,李树人.分娩镇痛法的临床应用与观察[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1989,9(2):102-104. 被引量:121
  • 2[1]Paech MJ.Epidural analgesia in labour,coastant infusion plus patient-controlled boluses[J].Anesth Intens Care,1991,19:32.
  • 3[2]乐杰妇产科学 [M].第五版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.12.
  • 4[6]Crosbg E,Sandler A,Finucane B,et al.Comparison of epidural anaes-thesia with ropivacaine 0.5% and bupuvacaine 0.5% for Caesarwan section[J].J Anaesth,1998,45:1033.
  • 5Capogna G,Celleno D,Fusco P,et al.Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour.Br J Anaesth,1999,82: 371-373.
  • 6Cederholm I.Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.Drug Saf 1997,16(6): 391-402.
  • 7Campbell DC,Zwack RM,Crone LA,et al.Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: bipivacaine versus ropivacaine.Anesth Analy.2000,90 ⑹:1384-1389.
  • 8Thorp JA,Hu DH,Albin RM,et al.The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labour: a randomised controlled prospective trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol ,1993,169: 851-858.
  • 9Loughnan BA,Carli F,Romney M,et al.Randomised controlled comparison of epidural versus pethidine for analgesia in labour.Br J Anaesth,2000,84: 715-719.
  • 10Olofsson C,Ekblom A,Ekman-Oreberg G,et al.Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine -adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil- a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1998,4

共引文献201

同被引文献28

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部