摘要
长期以来,我们对马克思的阶级理论存在误解,教条式的应用该理论进行社会分析,从而不能真实、全面地反映社会的基本面貌。将马克思与韦伯的阶级理论进行比较可以发现,虽然两者在阶级利益的问题上观点大相径庭,但对经济利益的强调成为阶级理论的共同关注。以产权制度改革为基础的市场经济体制的推进所导致的利益,尤其是经济利益的冲突和矛盾,导致了现代法律秩序的生成和创新。阶级是也应当是转型时期中国法学理论研究的一个不可或缺的维度。
In a long period the Chinese legal scholars inaccurately employed Marxists＇ theory of class in social analysis based on some misunderstandings, and thus unable to reflect the society in a better way. Based on a comparison of the theory of Marx and Weber, we can find out that although there are crucial differences on the economic interest of classes, their common concern is the stress of economic interest. The interest rooted from market economy based on title reform, especially the conflict of economic interest, led to the creation and innovation of modem legal order. Class should be an indispensible dimension in China＇ s legal science in transition time.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期97-106,共10页
Law and Social Development
关键词
阶级
阶层
经济利益
法律秩序
class
ranks
economic interests
legal order
