期刊文献+

群体水平领域分数及其估计方法 被引量:5

Group-level Domain Score and Its Estimation Methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 对人才的需求已经引起各国政府和国际组织对教育的高度重视,纷纷在国家和地区层面进行大规模的教育评估。在大尺度教育评估中,如何向政府、管理者和公众报告学生表现是不可避免的重要问题。报告学生表现有多种方式,领域分数作为管理者和公众最容易理解和接受的分数报告工具之一,在近些年受到研究者和实践者的关注,因此也成为了大型教育评价项目的必然选择。文中将介绍群体领域分数的起源和定义,并重点介绍群体领域分数的估计方法和相关研究,最后对未来开展进一步研究进行展望。 Needs for talent resources have gotten many countries and international organizations'high attentions,and they all have done some large-scale education assessments in country or region level.How to translate the students' performance into readable and informative score reports is an important and inevitable problems confronted by the large scale assessment.Domain score is often preferred by researchers and practitioners because of its understandability and readability for public.This paper detailed the definition of group domain score,its estimation methods and relevant researches,finally discussed the further study needed in the further.
作者 辛涛 谢敏
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期416-422,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(项目批准号:NCET-07-0097) 全国教育科学规划教育考试科学研究专项
关键词 大尺度教育评估 群体领域分数 估计方法 IRT方法 Large-scale educational assessment group-level domain score estimation method IRT method
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bay, L. , Chen, L. , Hanson B.A., Happel J. , Kolen M.J. , Miller T. , et al. (1997). ACT' s NAEP redesign project: assessment design is the key to useful and stable assessment results. National Center for Education Statistics( ED ) , Washington, DC.
  • 2Berk, R. A. (1980). A consumers' guide to criterion-referenced test reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(4) , 323 - 349.
  • 3Bock, R. D., Thissen D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). IRT estimation of domain scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34 (3), 197-211.
  • 4Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, M., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
  • 5Hambleton, R. K. , Swaminathan, H. , Algina, J. , & Coulson D. B. (1978). Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: a review of technical issues and developments. Review of Educational Research, 48, 1-47.
  • 6Hambleton, R. K. (1983). Application of item response models to criterion-referenced assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(1), 33-44.
  • 7Kaiser, H. F., & Michael, W. B. (1975). Domain validity and generalizability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 31 -35.
  • 8Kane, M. , & Wilson, J. (1984). Errors of measurement and standard setting in mastery testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8 ( 1 ), 107 - 115.
  • 9Lin, M. H. , & Hsiung, C. A. (1994). Empirical bayes estimates of domain scores under binomial and hypergeometric distributions for test scores. Psychometrika, 59 (3), 331 - 359.
  • 10Mazzeo, J. , Kulick, E. Tay-Lim, B. , & Perie M. (2006). Technical report for the 2000 market-basket study in mathematics. ETS NAEP Technical and Research Report Series.

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部