期刊文献+

异丙酚和七氟烷麻醉对心率变异性的不同影响 被引量:4

A Comparison of Heart Rate Variability during Propfol Versus Sevoflurane Anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察异丙酚和七氟烷麻醉对心率变异性的不同影响.方法 选择择期行妇科腹腔镜手术病人40例,随机分为两组,异丙酚组(P组,20例)术中以异丙酚麻醉维持,七氟烷组(S组,20例)术中以七氟烷麻醉维持.记录麻醉前、麻醉诱导后、插管后、切皮后、气腹形成后、关气腹、拔管后10min七个时点的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、BIS和低频(LF)、高频(HF)、低高频比值(LF/HF)、心率变异指数(HRV)等心率变异性指标.结果 麻醉诱导后两组病人的HR、MAP、BIS、HRV、HF、LF、LF/HF均显著性下降( P〈0.05),两组间无显著差异.在麻醉维持过程中P组LF值显著降低,HF值不降低甚至略有升高,LF/HF值显著下降;S组LF及HF均显著降低,与P组相比LF降低更明显( P〈0.05),S组LF/HF值无明显变化,与P组有显著性差异( P〈0.05).结论 异丙酚对交感神经系统抑制明显,异丙酚麻醉自主神经系统向副交感神经占优势的方向转变;七氟烷对迷走神经系统和交感神经系统均有抑制,对自主神经系统的平衡性无明显影响. Objective To compare heart rate variability during propfol anesthesia versus sevoflurane in gyne- cology laparoscope. Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients aged 18 - 60 yr undergoing gynecology laparoscope were enrolled in this study.They were randomly divided into two groups:P group(n=20) and S group (n=20).Propfol anesthesia was conducted in P group, while sevoflurane anesthesia was conducted in S group. HR, MAP, BIS and four HRV parameters were continuously monitored and recorded at seven points: baseline before anesthesia (T1),after induction (T2),after tracheal induction(T3),after skin incision(T4),pneumoperitoneum(T5),cease of pneumoperitoneum(T6), 10 minutes after extubation (T7).HRV was analyzed by power spectrum analysis:low fre- quency (LF),high frequency (HF),LF/HF ratio. Results LF and LF/HF were dramatically decreased but HF was not dramatically in P group,LF and HF were dramatically decreased but LF/HF was not dramatically in S group. HR, MAP, BIS, HRV, HF, LF, LF/HF were significantiydecreased after anesthesia induction(P〈0.05),but there was no significant difference between two groups. During anesthesia maintenance,LF was significantly de- creased in two groups,S group was significantly lower(P〈0.05).HF was not decreased, even increased in P group, while it was significantly decreased in S group compared with baseline(P〈0.05).LF/HF was significantly decreased in P group(P〈0.05),while it was not significantly decreased in S group.There was significant difference in two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion Propfol can depress the sympathetic nerve, and so the automatic nervous system balance tends to parasympathetic nerve.While sevoflurane can depress both sympathetic and vagus nerve,and the automatic nervous system balance is not changed.
出处 《中国血液流变学杂志》 CAS 2010年第2期250-252,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hemorheology
关键词 腹腔镜 心率变异性 七氟烷 异丙酚 Laparoscope HRV Sevoflurane Propfol
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张军龙,屠伟峰,戴建强,曾因明.老年糖尿病患者非心脏手术后心脏自主神经功能的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(4):312-314. 被引量:9
  • 2朱耀民.心率变异性分析在冠心病病人围术期的意义[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2002,23(4):249-250. 被引量:3
  • 3Ledowski T,Bein B,Hanss R,et al.Neuroendocrine stress response and heart rate variability:a comparison of total intravenous versus balanced anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,2005,101(6):1700-1705.
  • 4Kanaya N,Hirata N,Kurosawa S,et al.Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on heart rate variability[J].Anesthesiology,2003,98(1):34-40.
  • 5Deutschman CS,Harris AP,Fleisher LA.Changes in heart rate variability under propofol anesthesia:A possible explanation for propofol-induced bradycardia[J].Anesth Analg,1994,79(2):373-377.
  • 6Huang HH,Chan HL,Lin PL,et al.Time-frenquency spectral analysis of heart rate variability during induction of general anaesthesia[J].Br J Anaesth,1997,79(6):754-758.
  • 7邓林,徐昆.心率变异性及其在临床和麻醉中的应用[J].医学综述,2005,11(8):744-746. 被引量:1
  • 8Pomfrett CJ.Heart rate variability,BIS and'depth of anaesthesia'[J].Br J Anaesth,1999,82(5):659-662.
  • 9Bickel A,Yahalom M,Roguin N,et al.Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during positive pressure pneumoperi-toneum:the significance of increased cardiac sympathetic expression[J].Surg Endosc,2002,16(9):1341-1344.
  • 10崔建修,孙强,赵国栋.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中CO_2气腹对心率变异性的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(6):560-561. 被引量:5

二级参考文献36

  • 1Fan SZ, Cheng YJ, Liu CC. Heart rate variability-a useful non-invasive tool in anaesthesiol. Sin, 1994,52( 1 ): S1 - 56.
  • 2O'Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Haemodynamle and neuroendoerine responses after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth,1996,76(5):640-644.
  • 3Hironea EA, Poikolalnen EO, Oaakkonen NE, et al. The adverse hemodynamic effects of anaesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc,2000,14(3): 272 - 277.
  • 4Johannsen G, Andersen M, Juhl B. The effect of general anesthesia on the haemodynamlc events during laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1989,33(2): 132 - 136.
  • 5Rothe CF, Flanagan AD, Maass-Moreno R. Reflex control of vascular capacitance during hypoxia, hypercapnla, or hypoxic hypercapnla. Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 1990,68 (5) : 384 - 391.
  • 6Bickel A,Yahalom M, Roguln 1N, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during positive pressure pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc, 2002,16 (5) : 537 - 539.
  • 7Sato N, Kawamoto M, Yuge O, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on cardiac autonomic nervous activity evaluated by heart rate variability analysis during sevoflurane,or propofol anesthesia. Surg Endosc,2000,14(4): 362 - 366.
  • 8Malik M. Heart patvarlability-strdardsefmeasurcment, physiologicalinterprctation and clinical use[J]. Circulation, 1996,93 ( 5 ) : 1043-1044.
  • 9Kingwell BA, Thompson JM, Kaye DM, et al. Heart rate spectral analysis, cardiac norepinephrine spillover, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during human sympathetic nervous activation and failure[J]. Circulation, 1994,90(1) :234-340.
  • 10Algra A, Tissen JGP, Roelandl JRTG, et al. Heart rate variability from24hour electrocardiography and the 2-year risk for sudden death[J]. Circulation, 1993,88(2) : 180-185.

共引文献13

同被引文献48

  • 1范雪梅,丁斌,张炳熙.肺段支气管异物的麻醉处理[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):150-150. 被引量:12
  • 2Jung HH, Lee JJ, Washington JM, et al. Inability of volatile anesthetics to inhibit oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced glu- tamate release via glutamate transporters and anion channels in rat corticostriatal slices. Brain Res, 2008, 1227: 234- 239.
  • 3Head BP, Patel P. Anesthetics and Brain protection. J Curr Opin Anesthesiol, 2007 , 20 ( 5 ) : 395 -399.
  • 4Lee SA, Choi JG, Zuo ZY. Volatile anesthetics attenuate oxi- dative stress, reduced activity of glutamate transporter type 3 . Anesthesia and Analgesia, 2009 , 109 ( 5 ) : 1506 - 1510.
  • 5Bilotta F, Caramia R, Paoloni FP, et al . Early postoperative cognitive recovery after remifentanil-propofol or sufentanil- propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a random- ized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2007 , 24 ( 2 ) : 122 - 127.
  • 6Hugo E, van Frank E, Frederick C. et al. Sevoflurane for in- terventional neuroradiology procedures is associated with mole rapid early recovery than propofol. Can J Anesth, 2004,51 (5) :486-491.
  • 7Dadd A, John L, Garetalh D, et al. Induction of anesthesia in the elderly ambulatory patient : a double-blinded comparison of propofol and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg, 2001 , 93 ( 5 ) : 1185-1187.
  • 8Paul D, Mandy E, Sally M, et al. The effects of propofol or sevoflurane on the estimated cerebral perfusion pressure and in- flow pressure. Anesth Analg, 2005,100 ( 3 ) : 835 -840.
  • 9Rohan D, Buggy DJ, Crowley S, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction 24 hr after minor surgery in the elderly. Can J Anesth, 2005, 52(2) : 137-142.
  • 10SIDDIQUI MN, SIDDIQUI ZA. Systematic review and meta-anal-ysis of intmopemtive versus preoperative endoscopic sphincteroto-my in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile ductstones[J]. Br J surg, 2012,99(1): 144.

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部