期刊文献+

人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的中期疗效观察 被引量:15

The mid-term results of cervical disc replacement for cervical spine myolopathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的中期临床效果。方法:2004年10月至2008年2月,对24例颈椎病患者共31个椎间隙行人工颈椎间盘置换术,其中脊髓型颈椎病21例28个椎间隙,神经根型颈椎病3例3个椎间隙;10例12个椎间隙应用Bryan假体,14例19个椎间隙应用Prodisc-C假体。术后随访24~65个月,平均39个月,定期对患者进行JOA评分和Oswestry颈椎功能障碍指数(ONDI)评定,并摄颈椎X线片测量置换节段及其相邻上下节段的活动度。结果:1例术后10个月手术节段椎体前缘骨质增生并融合,活动度丢失。其余患者随访期间置换节段稳定,颈椎生理弧度没有明显丢失;没有假体下沉和明显偏移;术后1个月、2年及末次随访时的JOA和ONDI评分与术前比较有统计学差异(P<0.01),术后各时间点两两比较无统计学差异(P>0.01)。术后1个月、2年及末次随访时置换节段及其相邻上下节段屈伸、左右侧屈活动度与术前比较无统计学差异(P>0.01),术后各时间点两两比较亦无统计学差异(P>0.01)。结论:人工颈椎间盘置换术后中期疗效满意,但仍然需要更长期随访结果来进一步评价其功能和对邻近节段的影响。 Objective:To investigate the mid-term clinical and radiological outcome of cervical disc replacement.Method:Twenty-four patients(31 discs) including 21 cases(28 discs) of spondylotic myelopathy and 3 cases(3 discs) of spondylotic radiculopathy undergoing artificial cervical disc replacement(12 Bryan discs and 19 Prodisc-C discs) from October 2004 to February 2008 were reviewed retrospectively.The follow-up was from 24 to 65 months with an averge of 39 months.X-ray,JOA score and Oswestry neck disability index(ONDI) were used to evaluate the outcome during following-up.Result:1 patient was noted to have bone bridging at anterior site of surgical segment which resulted in the loss of ROM 10 month later,while segment stability and cervical alignment were kept in other patients with no prosthesis subsidence and displacement.The postoperative JOA score and ONDI at 1 month and 2 years showed statistical significance(P0.01)compared with those of preoperative,but no statistical significance(P0.01) were noted between each postoperative time point.The postoperative flexion-extension and lateral bending ROM of either surgical segment or adjacent segments showed no difference with preoperative counterparts(P0.01),and the same for each postoperative time points(P0.01).Conclusion:It is a good mid-term outcome for artifical cervical disc replacement.At least 5 years of followed up time should be needed to assess the long term functionality of the prosthesis and the influence on adjacent levels.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期567-571,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 颈椎病 人工颈椎间盘置换术 疗效 Degenerative cervical disc disease Cervical disc replacement Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Pointillart V.Cervical disc prosthesis in humans:first failures[J].Spine,2001,26(5):90-92.
  • 2Goffin J,Van Calenbergh F,Van Loon J,el al.Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:single-level and bi-level[J].Spine,2003,28(24):2673-2678.
  • 3Sasso RC,Smucker JD,Hacker RJ,et al.Artificial disc versus fusion:a prospective,randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(26):2933-2942.
  • 4Beaurain J,Bernard P,Dufonr T,et al.Intermediate clinical and radiologieal results of cervical TDR(Mobi-C)with up to 2 years of follow-up[J].Eur Spine J,2009,18(6):841-850.
  • 5Goffin J,van Loon J,Van Cahnbergh F,et al.A clinical analysis of 4-and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis[J].J Neurosurg,Spine,2010,12(3):261-269.
  • 6Yang S,Wu X,Hu Y,et al.Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:single-and multiple-level[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(12):E371-377.
  • 7孙宇,赵衍斌,周非非,刘忠军.Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换术的中期随访结果分析[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(5):333-337. 被引量:9
  • 8Piekett GE,Sekhon LH,Sears WR,et al.Complication with cervical arthmplasty[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2006,4(2):98-105.
  • 9Leung C,Casey AT,Goffin J,el al.Clinical significance of heterotopie ossification in cervical disc replacement:a prospective multieenter clinical trial[J].Neurosurgery,2005,57(4):759-763.
  • 10Sola S,Hebecker R,Knoop M,et al.Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:three years follow-up[J].Ear Spine J,2005,14(Suppl 1):38.

二级参考文献15

  • 1孙宇,潘胜发,张凤山,张立.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期临床观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):85-89. 被引量:44
  • 2Pye SR, Reid DR, Lunt M, et al. Lumbar disc degeneration: association between osteophytes, end-plate sclerosis and disc space narrowing. Ann Rheum Dis, 2007, 66:330-333.
  • 3White AA, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine : a review of past and current knowledge. Spine, 1978, 3 : 12-20.
  • 4Pfirrmann WA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Spine, 2001, 26: 1873-1878.
  • 5Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis . Neurosurgery, 2002, 51 :840-847.
  • 6Lee SC, Lee SH. Clinical and radiographic comparison of the Bryan cervical disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine J, 2006, 6:131S-132S.
  • 7Goffin J, Johan VL, Frank VC. Cervical Arthroplasty with the Bryan Disc: 4-Year Results. Spine J, 2006, 6: 62S-63S.
  • 8Goffin J, Johan VL, Frank VC. Cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan disc: 4- and 6-year results. The Annual of Cervical Spine Research Society, 2006.
  • 9Coric D, Finger FE, Bohes P. Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan cervical disc : intermediate results from a single investigational site. Neurosurgery, 2006, 59:460-462.
  • 10Sasso RC, Hacker R, Heller JG. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. The Annual of Cervical Spine Research Society, 2006.

共引文献8

同被引文献181

引证文献15

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部