期刊文献+

高危症状性颈动脉狭窄支架成形术的疗效分析 被引量:11

Carotid angioplasty and stenting for high-risk symptomatic carotid stenosis:an efficacy analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析颈动脉支架成形术治疗高危症状性颈动脉狭窄的有效性和安全性。方法对20例高危症状性颈动脉狭窄患者进行颈动脉支架成形术治疗,其中男12例,女8例;年龄为62~76岁,平均69岁。其中短暂性脑缺血发作11例,脑梗死9例。对所有患者均行全脑血管造影,显示颈动脉狭窄率均>70%,其中一侧颈动脉重度狭窄9例(2例为颈动脉剥脱术后再狭窄);双侧颈动脉重度狭窄6例;一侧颈动脉闭塞,另一侧重度狭窄5例(1例为鼻咽癌放疗术后)。对所有患者使用脑保护装置,并均采用预扩张,预扩张后均使用自膨式支架。结果技术成功率为100%,残余狭窄率均<30%。所有患者术中均出现不同程度的短暂性心率、血压下降,1例患者出现了微栓子栓塞,无其他严重并发症;其余患者围手术期内无缺血性卒中发作。术后复查颈动脉超声见,显示狭窄明显改善。结论颈动脉支架治疗高危症状性颈动脉狭窄创伤小,围手术期并发症少,是安全、有效的。 Objective To analyze the effectiveness and safety of angioplasty and stenting (CAS) for treatment of high-risk symptomatic carotid arterial stenosis. Methods A total of 20 patients with high- risk symptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were treated with CAS. Among them, 12 were men and 8 were women, mean age 69 years (62 to 76 years ). Of the 20 patients, 11 had TIA and 9 had cerebral infarc- tion. All patients underwent pan-cerebral angiography and it showed that the rate of carotid arterial stenosis 〉70% according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Among them, 9 patients had unilateral severe carotid arterial stenosis (2 had restenosis after carotid endar- terectomy), 6 had bilateral severe carotid arterial stenosis, 5 had unilateral carotid artery occlusion and contralateral severe stenosis (1 was after nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy). The cerebral protection device and pre-dilation were used in all patients, and the self-expandable stents were used after the pre-di- lation. Results The success rate of the procedure was 100%. The rate of residual stenosis was 〈 30%. All patients had different levels of transient decrease of heart rate and blood pressure after the procedure. One patient had microembolic infarction, and no other serious complications were found. No other ischemic stroke occurred in the periprocedural period. The reexamination of carotid artery ultrasound after the proce- dures showed that the stenosis were improved obviously. Conclusion CAS is less invasive and its perioperative complications is rare. It is safe and effective for treatment of high-risk symptomatic carotid arterial stenosis.
出处 《中国脑血管病杂志》 CAS 2010年第7期360-364,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
基金 “十一五”国家科技支撑技术项目(2007BA105B04)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架 有效性研究 Carotid stenosis Stents Validation studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Bozzao A, Fioris R, Gaudiello F, et al. Hemodynamic modifications in patients with symptomatic unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery: evaluation with MR imaging perfusion sequences [ J ]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002,23 ( 8 ) : 1342-1345.
  • 2Kamouchi M, Kishikawa K, Okada Y, et al. Reappraisal of flow velocity ratio in common carotid artery to predict hemodynamic change in carotid stenosis[ J ]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005,26 ( 4 ) : 957-962.
  • 3Liistro F, D Mario C. Carotid artery stenting[J]. Heart, 2003,89 (8) :944-948.
  • 4Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Bignamini A, et al. Carotid artery stenting first consensus document of the ICCS- SPREAD Joint Committee [ J ]. Stroke, 2006, 37 ( 9 ) : 2400 -2409.
  • 5符伟国,王利新,王玉琦.颅外段颈动脉狭窄治疗指南[J].中国实用外科杂志,2008,28(11):913-915. 被引量:52
  • 6Casserly IP, Yadav JS. Carotid intervention // Casserly IP, Saehar R, Yadav JS. Manual of peripheral vascular intervention [ M ]. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams, 2005 : 83-109.
  • 7Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patientswith carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) : a randomized trial [J]. Lancet,2001,357(9270) :1729-1737.
  • 8Carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke[ J]. J Neurol SCi~1995,129 ( 1 ) :76-77.
  • 9Fairman R, Gray WA, Seieli AP, et al. The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting : timing, location, severity,and type[ J]. Ann Surg,2007,246(4) :551-558.
  • 10Kastru PA, Grosehel K, Krapf H, et al. Earty outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection deviees: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Stroke,2003,34(3):813-819,.

二级参考文献2

共引文献72

同被引文献89

引证文献11

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部